On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:35:06AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:02 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > I understand the motivation; for newly created files, PH rules obviously
> > should be followed. For already existing patches, esp. when their contents
> > stays the same, such
On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:02 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:31:37PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 15:54:38 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>> ...
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 +11 -0 ports/chinese/tin/files/patch-tin.defaults (new)
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:31:37PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 15:54:38 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > ...
> > > Revision ChangesPath
> > > 1.1 +11 -0 ports/chinese/tin/files/patch-tin.defaults (new)
> > > 1.2 +0 -11 ports/chinese/tin/files/
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 15:54:38 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> ...
> > Revision ChangesPath
> > 1.1 +11 -0 ports/chinese/tin/files/patch-tin.defaults (new)
> > 1.2 +0 -11 ports/chinese/tin/files/patch-tin_defaults (dead)
>
> This renaming of the patch file just beca
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 03:34:21PM +, Yen-Ming Lee wrote:
> leeym 2012-01-02 15:34:21 UTC
> patch-mail.c
> Added files:
> chinese/tin/filespatch-tin.defaults
> Removed files:
> chinese/tin/filespatch-tin_defaults
>
> Revision Changes
leeym 2012-01-02 15:34:21 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
chinese/tin Makefile
chinese/tin/filespatch-attrib.c patch-cook.c patch-init.c
patch-mail.c
Added files:
chinese/tin/filespatch-tin.defaults
Removed files
