ak 2012-04-17 16:12:13 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
java/eclipseme Makefile
Log:
- deprecate: depends on java/sun-wtk
Approved by:eadler (mentor)
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +3 -0 ports/java/eclipseme/Makefile
__
glewis 2010-07-14 03:42:59 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
java/eclipseme Makefile pkg-plist
Log:
. Update paths for new eclipse version.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +3 -3 ports/java/eclipseme/Makefile
1.3 +75 -75ports/java/ecli
miwi2010-02-13 19:09:45 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
java/eclipseme Makefile
Added files:
java/eclipseme/files pkg-message.in
Removed files:
java/eclipseme pkg-message
Log:
- Use $SUB_FILES to dynamically adjust pkg-message
PR:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 09:23:35PM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:46:49 +
> Alexey Dokuchaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> >
> > For correctness' sake it should be noted that only in case of multiple
> > file installations. Single file will succeed (it will be insta
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:46:49 +
Alexey Dokuchaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> For correctness' sake it should be noted that only in case of multiple
> file installations. Single file will succeed (it will be installed with
> target directory name).
>
That's why it's a good tradition t
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:30:02AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>>
>>> Still, the mkdir call may fall, and then the failure is less obvious to
>>> the user/porter.
>> If mkdir fails, the install of the files will fail,
>
> For correctness' sake it sho
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:30:02AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>
> > Still, the mkdir call may fall, and then the failure is less obvious to
> > the user/porter.
>
> If mkdir fails, the install of the files will fail,
For correctness' sake it should be noted that only in cas
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Still, the mkdir call may fall, and then the failure is less obvious to
> the user/porter.
If mkdir fails, the install of the files will fail, leading to an
obvious error (even if the cause of the error might take a little
detective work). If the mkdir succeeds, then instal
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:42:19PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>
> Sorry, but I don't consider the muting of mkdir commands as something
> that can lead to insecure or simply broken-by-design port. Thus it's not
> worth a policy.
Agreed, it's not that important. When I said it should be a policy
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:24:40PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v st 19. 03. 2008 v 11:23 +:
>
> > I wonder what's wrong with coherent and sane policies? I don't expect
> > it would be hard to come to agreement about muting/not muting
> > mkdir's/installation statements
Stanislav Sedov píše v st 19. 03. 2008 v 15:37 +0300:
> > I like the high level of creative freedom the maintainer is entitled to.
> > Rigid policies on unimportant details of style will kill the fun.
> This freedom usually leads to insecure or simply broken-by-design ports in
> tree.
> For an e
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:24:40 +0100
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Alexey Dokuchaev píše v st 19. 03. 2008 v 11:23 +:
>
> > I wonder what's wrong with coherent and sane policies? I don't expect
> > it would be hard to come to agreement about muting/not muting
> > mkdir's/insta
Alexey Dokuchaev píše v st 19. 03. 2008 v 11:23 +:
> I wonder what's wrong with coherent and sane policies? I don't expect
> it would be hard to come to agreement about muting/not muting
> mkdir's/installation statements. These things are not of the type people
> usually feel strongly about.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:38:17PM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:18:52 +0100
> Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> >
> > Still, the mkdir call may fall, and then the failure is less obvious to
> > the user/porter.
> >
>
> On the other hand, the porter can alway
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:18:52AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v st 19. 03. 2008 v 09:18 +:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:02:33AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v ?t 18. 03. 2008 v 18:15 +:
> > >
> > > > Not to mention that -R should've pro
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:18:52 +0100
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> Still, the mkdir call may fall, and then the failure is less obvious to
> the user/porter.
>
On the other hand, the porter can always modify the call temporarly to see
where the problem resides.
>
> Oh no more
Alexey Dokuchaev píše v st 19. 03. 2008 v 09:18 +:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:02:33AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v ?t 18. 03. 2008 v 18:15 +:
> >
> > > Not to mention that -R should've probably be used instead or -r, and we
> > > generally try not to mute insta
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:02:33AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v ?t 18. 03. 2008 v 18:15 +:
>
> > Not to mention that -R should've probably be used instead or -r, and we
> > generally try not to mute installation of files/links (as opposed to
> > dirs).
>
> Since you m
Alexey Dokuchaev píše v út 18. 03. 2008 v 18:15 +:
> Not to mention that -R should've probably be used instead or -r, and we
> generally try not to mute installation of files/links (as opposed to
> dirs).
Since you mentioned it, I wonder, why you think it's useful to silence
the mkdir calls?
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:22:24 +0800
Rong-En Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 08:56:47PM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:54:27 +0100
> > Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> >
> > > Stanislav Sedov píše v út 18. 03. 2008 v 19:50 +0300:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 08:56:47PM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:54:27 +0100
> Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> > Stanislav Sedov píše v út 18. 03. 2008 v 19:50 +0300:
> > > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:43:08 +0100
> > > Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentione
gahr2008-03-18 21:52:45 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
java/eclipseme Makefile
Log:
- Fix typo
Reported by:danfe
Approved by:miwi (mentor)
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +2 -1 ports/java/eclipseme/Makefile
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
| On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 07:38:55PM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
|> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:00:26 + (UTC)
|> Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
|>
|>> gahr2008-03-18 01:00:26 UTC
|>>
|>> FreeBSD port
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 07:38:55PM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:00:26 + (UTC)
> Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> > gahr2008-03-18 01:00:26 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > java/eclipseme Makefile
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:54:27 +0100
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Stanislav Sedov píše v út 18. 03. 2008 v 19:50 +0300:
> > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:43:08 +0100
> > Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> > >
> > > It will also change permissions on all files already present
Stanislav Sedov píše v út 18. 03. 2008 v 19:50 +0300:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:43:08 +0100
> Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> >
> > It will also change permissions on all files already present in the
> > target directory, I think. Which might not be a desirable thing.
> >
>
> Indee
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:43:08 +0100
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> It will also change permissions on all files already present in the
> target directory, I think. Which might not be a desirable thing.
>
Indeed, I know. That's why I'm asking if it'll be desirable.
--
Stanislav
Stanislav Sedov píše v út 18. 03. 2008 v 19:38 +0300:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:00:26 + (UTC)
> Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> > gahr2008-03-18 01:00:26 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > java/eclipseme Makefile distinfo p
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:00:26 + (UTC)
Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> gahr2008-03-18 01:00:26 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> java/eclipseme Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
> Log:
> - Update to 0.4.6
>
> Approved by:miwi (
gahr2008-03-18 01:00:26 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
java/eclipseme Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
Log:
- Update to 0.4.6
Approved by:miwi (mentor)
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +5 -8 ports/java/eclipseme/Makefile
1.3 +3 -
pav 2007-07-16 08:58:28 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
java/eclipseme Makefile
java/sun-wtk Makefile pkg-descr
mbone/mclMakefile pkg-descr
x11-fonts/avifonts Makefile
x11-fonts/mgopen Makefile
Log:
- Drop maint
31 matches
Mail list logo
