On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:20:53PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 28 September 2006 12:21, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > Are there any others outside of SES? How many? If it's a small list,
> > > then
> > > let's fix them. The SES ones are broken as an API anyway as mentioned
> > > ab
On Thursday 28 September 2006 12:21, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Are there any others outside of SES? How many? If it's a small list, then
> > let's fix them. The SES ones are broken as an API anyway as mentioned
> > above,
> > and if other ioctl's are copying out a variable amount of data w/o
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:56:27AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 September 2006 18:12, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > There are some _IO() ioctls that pass a pointer to variable sized data,
> > and their ioctl handlers to uiocopy'ing rather than ioctl(). See
> > sys/cam/scsi/scsi_ses.c,
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 18:12, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:52:56PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Could you avoid IOWINT by just assuming that any _IO() ioctl is getting an
int
> > as the arg?
> >
> There are some _IO() ioctls that pass a pointer to variable sized d
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 17:29, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:10:51PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
I still think doing this (via IOCPARM_IVAL()) is best and is probably a
much
smaller diff.
You don't consider that many ioctls
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:52:56PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> Could you avoid IOWINT by just assuming that any _IO() ioctl is getting an
> int
> as the arg?
>
There are some _IO() ioctls that pass a pointer to variable sized data,
and their ioctl handlers to uiocopy'ing rather than ioctl(). S
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 17:29, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:10:51PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 September 2006 17:03, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > Eh? You just changed ioctl values breaking ABI all over the place, e.g.
> > > sys/pioctl.h. The size fie
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:10:51PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 September 2006 17:03, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Eh? You just changed ioctl values breaking ABI all over the place, e.g.
> > sys/pioctl.h. The size field changed from 0 to sizeof(int) meaning
> > different ioctl values
Hi John,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:03:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 September 2006 15:57, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > ru 2006-09-27 19:57:02 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > sys/dev/atkbdc atkbd.c
> > sys/dev/digi
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 17:03, John Baldwin wrote:
> Eh? You just changed ioctl values breaking ABI all over the place, e.g.
> sys/pioctl.h. The size field changed from 0 to sizeof(int) meaning
> different ioctl values and thus ABI breakage.
Bah, I see you did add compat hacks for the ol
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 15:57, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> ru 2006-09-27 19:57:02 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> sys/dev/atkbdc atkbd.c
> sys/dev/digi digi.c
> sys/dev/kbdmux kbdmux.c
> sys/dev/syscons scvidctl.c sy
11 matches
Mail list logo
