Re: [cvsnt] Is it possible to lock a user out of HEAD, but grant them full access to a branch?

2008-10-13 Thread Terry Beavers
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 4:47 AM To: Terry Beavers; cvsnt@cvsnt.org Subject: RE: [cvsnt] Is it possible to lock a user out of HEAD,but grant them full access to a branch? Terry, > Not only do we receive an email from Fisheye reporting the new file > added on the branch, but we also

Re: [cvsnt] Is it possible to lock a user out of HEAD, but grant them full access to a branch?

2008-10-09 Thread Arthur Barrett
Terry, > Not only do we receive an email from Fisheye reporting the new file > added on the branch, but we also receive an email that reports the new > file has been added on HEAD as well, although the file doesn't > physically reside on HEAD at that point, only the branch. Sounds like Fisheye i

[cvsnt] Is it possible to lock a user out of HEAD, but grant them full access to a branch?

2008-10-08 Thread Terry Beavers
I thought I was finally starting to understand the use of ACL's and branch locking, but have now come across a scenario that doesn't seem to work. Basically, we want to grant full access to a user on a branch, but want to give that user READ ONLY access on HEAD. The problem is when I setup the