On Tuesday 11 of November 2008, Arthur Barrett wrote:
> Arkadiusz,
>
> I appreciate your time and effort on this - however if you just slow down a
> little and explain things a little clearer we'll be able to make much more
> use of the information being supplied.
Ok, I'll try to put everything in
Arkadiusz,
I appreciate your time and effort on this - however if you just slow down a
little and explain things a little clearer we'll be able to make much more use
of the information being supplied.
> > Again. You're trying to claim something is broken that
> > I use every day.
>
> You don
On Monday 10 of November 2008, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>
> A couple of points:
> > This rule only applies to ::, not ::1.
>
> This is entirely irrelevant as there are only two possible cases. The
> code is written to handle both cases transparently, and does.
>
> $ netstat
On Monday 10 of November 2008, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>
> Again. You're trying to claim something is broken that I use every day.
You don't use it in a way that triggers brokeness.
> I even posted examples of it working correctly. You can check yourself
> by connecting
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
A couple of points:
> This rule only applies to ::, not ::1.
This is entirely irrelevant as there are only two possible cases. The
code is written to handle both cases transparently, and does.
$ netstat -an | grep 2402
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:2402 0
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>>
Again. You're trying to claim something is broken that I use every day.
I even posted examples of it working correctly. You can check yourself
by connecting to cvs.cvsnt.org over ipv6.
Please read http://www.cvsnt.org/wiki/BugReporting and provide all the
inform
On Sunday 09 of November 2008, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > IPv6 support seems quite broken in cvsnt (looking at 2.5.04.3236)
> >
> > It doesn't support [ipv6]:port notation, binds to ::1 port while it
> > should bind to ipv4 address, too (cvslockd as example. Server tries to
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> IPv6 support seems quite broken in cvsnt (looking at 2.5.04.3236)
>
> It doesn't support [ipv6]:port notation, binds to ::1 port while it should
> bind to ipv4 address, too (cvslockd as example. Server tries to
> use "localhost" name which resolves only to 127.0.0.1
IPv6 support seems quite broken in cvsnt (looking at 2.5.04.3236)
It doesn't support [ipv6]:port notation, binds to ::1 port while it should
bind to ipv4 address, too (cvslockd as example. Server tries to
use "localhost" name which resolves only to 127.0.0.1 address, tries to
connect to it but
