Re: cygwin install failing at download/progress stage

On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 04:27, Ben wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to reinstall cygwin after an upgrade to XP. Did you reinstall windows, or do an in-place upgrade? If it was in-place, your cygwin install should have just kept working... If its not working, or if you deleted it, you'll need to repair

Re: cat: snapshot 20040409 cures problem

On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 07:06:21AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The current cygwin-1.5.9 and snapshots up to 20040406 have exhibited an > intermittent problem with cat: the error msg "input file is output file" has > been presented during a long sequence > > cat f.1 f.2 f.3 ... f.n > f.

Re: 1.5.9-1: socket() appears NOT to be thread-safe

On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:16:03AM +0800, Enzo Michelangeli wrote: >What I can do for the time being is to provide the testcase that Corinna >asked for (attached below). Here are the results: I can duplicate the behavior noted here. I sent Corinna a patch in private email. I'm not thrilled with

Re: 1.5.9-1: socket() appears NOT to be thread-safe

I wrote: - Original Message - From: "Enzo Michelangeli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ""Brian Ford"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:16 AM Subject: Re: 1.5.9-1: socket() appears NOT to be thread-safe [...] > By the way, even in case of no error the

Re: cygwin install failing at download/progress stage

On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:38:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >(Wish there was an English newsgroup for this too) There is an unofficial newsgroup gateway for this mailing list. See the main cygwin web page for a link. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: cygwin install failing at download/progress stage

Didn't I mention about this last time? Eeks - sorry. I missed it amongst the response and skipped over it. I have to make a transition from newsgroup to listserver. (Wish there was an English newsgroup for this too) That's the log from a failed

Re: 1.5.9-1: socket() appears NOT to be thread-safe

- Original Message - From: "Brian Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Enzo Michelangeli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 1:05 AM Subject: Re: 1.5.9-1: socket() appears NOT to be thread-safe > On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Enzo Michelangeli wrote: > > > While p

Re: cygwin install failing at download/progress stage

At 05:22 PM 4/14/2004, you wrote: >Larry Hall - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Didn't I mention about this last time? >>>get_url_to_membuf failed! >>>2004/03/24 00:48:36 mbox note: Unable to get setup.ini from >>>

Re: co-linux

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:34:09 -0400, Sam Steingold wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >This is confusing. >Unix is a class of OSes. >Linux is an instance of that class. >The syntax of your sentence implies that, when you say Unix, you mean >an instance, not the class. Which instance? SCO UNIX? AIX?

Re: ls gets lost in /proc/registry

On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 06:35:45PM -0400, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) wrote: >I did an ls -R through /proc/registry. When ls hit the mount table, with >cygdrive = / , it got lost, thought the / entry was the root directory, and >went to / before continuing with the rest of /proc/registry. Known

RE: co-linux

> * Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-14 12:55:10 +0100]: > >> I have just read about beta release of co-linux (linux on >> windows). Is this product going to kill cygwin. What will be the >> benefits of using cygwin in that case. > > Having a Unix-alike, rather than a Linux-alike, for one.

ls gets lost in /proc/registry

I did an ls -R through /proc/registry. When ls hit the mount table, with cygdrive = / , it got lost, thought the / entry was the root directory, and went to / before continuing with the rest of /proc/registry. I don't know if this is a bug, feature, quirk, "by design", or "none of the above", but

Re: cygwin install failing at download/progress stage

Larry Hall - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: get_url_to_membuf failed! 2004/03/24 00:48:36 mbox note: Unable to get setup.ini from 2004/03/24 00:48:41 site: ftp://ftp.easynet.be/cygwin get_url_to_membuf ftp://ftp.easynet.be/cygwin/setup.bz2 getUrlToStream ftp:/

Re: permission problems (and more)

At 04:43 PM 4/14/2004, you wrote: >Running cygwin (on Windows 2000) for a few months, and >finally decided that I wanted sshd and cron activated. > >Logged on as administrator and did: > >cron: >cygrunsrv -I cron -p /bin/cron -a -D > >sshd: >run the ssh-host-config script and answer the questions (

permission problems (and more)

Running cygwin (on Windows 2000) for a few months, and finally decided that I wanted sshd and cron activated. Logged on as administrator and did: cron: cygrunsrv -I cron -p /bin/cron -a -D sshd: run the ssh-host-config script and answer the questions (I read several tutorials that all said about

Re: cygwin install failing at download/progress stage

At 03:34 PM 4/14/2004, you wrote: >Larry Hall - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>At 02:27 PM 4/14/2004, you wrote: >> >> >>>I am trying to reinstall cygwin after an upgrade to XP. I run setup to >>>install from the internet (DSL) and get a list of the ftp s

RE: co-linux

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pinhas Krengel >Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:51 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: co-linux > > >I have just read about beta release of co-linux (linux on windows). Is this >product going to kill cygwi

Re: cygwin install failing at download/progress stage

Larry Hall - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 02:27 PM 4/14/2004, you wrote: I am trying to reinstall cygwin after an upgrade to XP. I run setup to install from the internet (DSL) and get a list of the ftp sites but regardless of which one I choose it freezes at the download window never changing fr

Re: cygwin install failing at download/progress stage

At 02:27 PM 4/14/2004, you wrote: >Hi, > >I am trying to reinstall cygwin after an upgrade to XP. I run setup to >install from the internet (DSL) and get a list of the ftp sites but >regardless of which one I choose it freezes at the download window never >changing from the "Connecting..." message.

Re: df reports negative values on Network Shares

At 02:55 PM 4/14/2004, you wrote: >I had exactly the same problem as Thomas... > >$ df -h >FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on >C:\Program Files\Borland\Interbase > 1.0G -64Z 37M 101% /opt/interbase >C:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\lib\X11\fonts >

df reports negative values on Network Shares

I had exactly the same problem as Thomas... $ df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on C:\Program Files\Borland\Interbase 1.0G -64Z 37M 101% /opt/interbase C:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\lib\X11\fonts 1.0G -64Z 37M 101% /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/

someone just for you

Dating in your area http://www.dateto.com/confirm/?oc=52979231 We have someone for you http://www.findingsite.com/x/?oc=52971007 Whoever you trust controls your future Your significance is not in you similarity to another but in your point of difference from another. Less is the first step

Re: Reformatting C/C++/Java code (RE: proposed sync() patch)

On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 04:29, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote: > Assuming you do not use strange formatting/style - the > output of indent will be perfectly acceptable, I presume. indent breaks nastily on C++. - it appears to work, but actually gets a number of things wrong. Just FYI. Rob -- GPG key

Re: co-linux

> * Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-14 12:55:10 +0100]: > >> I have just read about beta release of co-linux (linux on >> windows). Is this product going to kill cygwin. What will be the >> benefits of using cygwin in that case. > > Having a Unix-alike, rather than a Linux-alike, for one.

Re: compilation with -mno-cygwin

Hi Chris, I have no used mingw per se for this. I just happened to have a spare time slot when I was reading the posting about the compiler performance comparison. So I simply added -mno-cygwin to the compile flags used to compile my sources (which btw, don't use anything cygwin specific - I think

Reformatting C/C++/Java code (RE: proposed sync() patch)

> From: Corinna Vinschen > On Apr 14 11:14, Dave Korn wrote: > > and GNU coding style would be > > > > +static int > > +sync_drive (char drive) > > > > which is probably the more appropriate here. > > GNU coding style is what we're trying to follow. > > Corinna i.e: $ indent -gnu read more

cygwin install failing at download/progress stage

Hi, I am trying to reinstall cygwin after an upgrade to XP. I run setup to install from the internet (DSL) and get a list of the ftp sites but regardless of which one I choose it freezes at the download window never changing from the "Connecting..." message. An error window titled "Internet Error"

Re: 1.5.9-1: socket() appears NOT to be thread-safe

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Enzo Michelangeli wrote: > While porting to Cygwin the Linux application "sipd" > (http://www.sxdesign.com/index.php?page=developer&submnu=sipd ), which > uses pthreads, I noticed that socket() calls issued concurrently by > several threads often failed, with strerror(errno) s

RE: Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers (including gcc cygming special)

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Frédéric L. W. Meunier > > Sent: 14 April 2004 07:35 > > > Anyway, does anybody know if GCC in Cygwin is compiled with > > --disable-checking ? gcc -v didn't return it, so it doesn't > > look like. It seems using it causes c

Re: zsh and cygwin

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Larry Hall wrote: > At 11:15 AM 4/14/2004, you wrote: > >On Wednesday, April 14, 2004, at 04:25PM, Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >[snip] > > > >>>Most of my co-workers already switched to using bash, since there never

Re: Problem with gzip

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote: > I have a problem with gzip. [snip] > Cygwin 1.5.5(0.94/3/2) [snip] > $ gunzip logs.tar.gz > > gunzip: logs.tar.gz: invalid compressed data--crc error > > gunzip: logs.tar.gz: invalid compressed data--length error http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/

RE: Unable to get CRON to work

> -Original Message- > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 5:52 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Unable to get CRON to work > > > Cygwin Support, > > I have done a new installation of cygwin into the C:\cygwin > folder. CRON > does not seem to be waking up and executing the crontab.

RE: Problem with gzip

> -Original Message- > From: Larry Hall > Sent: 14 April 2004 16:16 > >> The above errors seem to indicate that gzip is correctly > >> detecting a damaged .gz file. > > > > Absolutely so. Every $0a byte got a bogus $0d prepended > to it. No wonder > >it wouldn't unpack! > > > Yeah?

Re: zsh and cygwin

At 11:15 AM 4/14/2004, you wrote: >On Wednesday, April 14, 2004, at 04:25PM, Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[snip] > >>>Most of my co-workers already switched to using bash, since there never >>>was an issue with it. Now I could do that too b

RE: Problem with gzip

At 10:57 AM 4/14/2004, you wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor >> Sent: 14 April 2004 15:36 > >> How about some *details* about how you made the suspect logs.tar.gz >> file. > > He made it by taking a valid .gz file and running it through u2d!

Re: zsh and cygwin

On Wednesday, April 14, 2004, at 04:25PM, Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] >>Most of my co-workers already switched to using bash, since there never >>was an issue with it. Now I could do that too but I love zsh. ;) >> >>Anyone else experiencing this? Comments? Ideas? Shrieking epitap

RE: Problem with gzip

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: 14 April 2004 15:36 > How about some *details* about how you made the suspect logs.tar.gz > file. He made it by taking a valid .gz file and running it through u2d! Or perhaps some accident with textmode m

Re: Problem with gzip

On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 10:29:54AM +0300, Alex Vinokur wrote: >Hi, > >I have a problem with gzip. > > >Windows 2000 Professional >Cygwin 1.5.5(0.94/3/2) >gzip 1.3.5 (2002-09-30) >guzip 1.3.5 (2002-09-30) > > >- >$ gunzip logs.tar.gz >

Re: Gold stars for an anonymous contributor

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:19:43AM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote: >After looking at the gold star list and for what the gold stars are >given, I'm wondering why the initiator of the /proc interface is not >listed. Just a question. I guess it must be the WJM principal. What else could it possibly be

Re: zsh and cygwin

At 03:28 AM 4/14/2004, you wrote: >Hi > >I'm a zsh-user since like forever and use cygwin for a several years >now. Every now and then when I made an update to my cygwin-environment >(on an Win2k platform with NTFS) I had issues with the newest >version when it came to running make. It either loope

Re: ncurses problem

At 03:01 AM 4/14/2004, you wrote: >From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> At 10:48 PM 4/13/2004, you wrote: >> >> >I'm having problems compiling a c++ program with ncurses. When it links I >> >get this message: >> There's dozens of packages in the d

Re: co-linux

On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 02:50:42PM +0200, Pinhas Krengel wrote: >I have just read about beta release of co-linux (linux on windows). Is this >product going to kill cygwin. No. >What will be the benefits of using cygwin in that case. Having a nicely integrated UNIX environment. Colinux just allo

RE: co-linux

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Jan Nieuwenhuizen > Sent: 14 April 2004 14:26 > Dave Korn writes: > > >> What will be the benefits of using cygwin in that case. > > > > Having a Unix-alike, rather than a Linux-alike, for one. > > Yah, Unix was so much cooler than

Re: co-linux

Dave Korn writes: >> What will be the benefits of using cygwin in that case. > > Having a Unix-alike, rather than a Linux-alike, for one. Yah, Unix was so much cooler than Linux. Don't we all pine for those times, where we would make all kinds of interesting workarounds for non-POSIX compliant

Re: 1.5.9-1: socket() appears NOT to be thread-safe

On Apr 14 18:42, Enzo Michelangeli wrote: > While porting to Cygwin the Linux application "sipd" > (http://www.sxdesign.com/index.php?page=developer&submnu=sipd ), which > uses pthreads, I noticed that socket() calls issued concurrently by > several threads often failed, with strerror(errno) saying

RE: co-linux

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Pinhas Krengel > Sent: 14 April 2004 13:51 > I have just read about beta release of co-linux (linux on > windows). Is this > product going to kill cygwin. > What will be the benefits of using cygwin in that case. Having a Unix-ali

co-linux

I have just read about beta release of co-linux (linux on windows). Is this product going to kill cygwin. What will be the benefits of using cygwin in that case. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentati

1.5.9-1: socket() appears NOT to be thread-safe

While porting to Cygwin the Linux application "sipd" (http://www.sxdesign.com/index.php?page=developer&submnu=sipd ), which uses pthreads, I noticed that socket() calls issued concurrently by several threads often failed, with strerror(errno) saying "operation not permitted". Once I protected all t

Re: proposed sync() patch

On Apr 14 11:14, Dave Korn wrote: > and GNU coding style would be > > +static int > +sync_drive (char drive) > > which is probably the more appropriate here. GNU coding style is what we're trying to follow. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to C

RE: proposed sync() patch

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dmitry Karasik > Sent: 13 April 2004 23:05 > ChangeLog: > > 2004-13-04 Dmitry Karasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * syscalls.cc: Implement sync() for letter-mapped drives Just a couple of style suggestions for your consideratio

RE: Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers (including gcc cygming special)

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Frédéric L. W. Meunier > Sent: 14 April 2004 07:35 > Anyway, does anybody know if GCC in Cygwin is compiled with > --disable-checking ? gcc -v didn't return it, so it doesn't > look like. It seems using it causes compilation times to >

RE: Does anyone know how to invoke a bash process via a dos batch program so commands after bash execute?

> Sent: 13 April 2004 19:33 From: Igor Pechtchanski > > Does anyone know how to invoke a bash process via a dos > batch program so > > commands after bash execute? > > Do you want to wait for bash to finish or not? See below. ..snip.. > The batch file called from a batch file is a red herring

Re: proposed sync() patch

This patch isn't a trivial patch so it requires a copyright assignment. See http://cygwin/com/contrib.html for details. Corinna P.S.: I'm still not convinced, though, that it's actually necessary to implement anything in sync. Also, why only drives with drive letters? What about drives which are

Re: reentrant functions

I just had a look into this again. On Apr 9 19:18, Bas van Gompel wrote: > Ok then, another try... > > Candidates getgrgid_r, getgrnam_r and getlogin_r are not > implemented. I'm wondering a bit about getgrgid_r and getgrnam_r. As you noted below, we have getpwnam_r and getpwuid_r so why did n

Problem with gzip

Hi, I have a problem with gzip. Windows 2000 Professional Cygwin 1.5.5(0.94/3/2) gzip 1.3.5 (2002-09-30) guzip 1.3.5 (2002-09-30) - $ gunzip logs.tar.gz gunzip: logs.tar.gz: invalid compressed data--crc error gunzip: logs.tar.gz

zsh and cygwin

Hi I'm a zsh-user since like forever and use cygwin for a several years now. Every now and then when I made an update to my cygwin-environment (on an Win2k platform with NTFS) I had issues with the newest version when it came to running make. It either looped forever or just hung somewhere. I usu

Re: ncurses problem

From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At 10:48 PM 4/13/2004, you wrote: > > >I'm having problems compiling a c++ program with ncurses. When it links I > >get this message: > There's dozens of packages in the distribution that use ncurses. Just look > at the setup.ini file in the directory you