Hi list,
It's been a while since I've played with cygwin and I've just recently came
back to it. Well... I had the same problems this time as I did in the
past, only last time I wasn't aware that there was a problem. It seems that
there are quite a few users that have experienced this same issu
From: "Michael A Chase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: $HOME Directory Relocation
> The problem with setting HOME to a fixed value in cygwin.bat or
/etc/profile
> is that limits your cygwin installation to a single user. That's why the
> default /etc/profile allows $HOME to be passed through
From: "Gerald Villemure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: /dev/registry
> So this:
> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run]
> "WinVNC"="data goes here"
>
> would become:
>
/proc/registry/HKLM/SOFTWARE/Microsoft/Windows/CurrentVersion/Run/WinVNC.sz
>
> Good or bad idea
From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A real fork() on NT
> Cygwin fork works just fine. It's slow but it should work as well as UNIX
> fork for a ported application. The only exception that I can think of is
> if you use dlopen to load a non-cygwin DLL. In that case the
From: "Chris January" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A real fork() on NT
> > That isn't really new. I'd like to point you to the example 6.1,
> > "Forking a Win32 Process" on p. 161ff of Gary Nebbett's excellent
> > book "Windows NT/2000 Native API Reference", published by MTP,
> > ISBN 1-578
From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why not a news server?
> "Reply-To" munging has also been discussed on this list previously.
> Please familiarize yourself with the arguments that have already been
> hashed out on this list in the past before continuing this line of
> disc
ad enough have them search the archives of the list for it, or else
join the list for the short time that it takes them to resolve their issue.
I mean, really, should a list be supportive of it's long standing members or
people that don't have the time to invest in finding an an
Yeah ;-/ This was my first reply to the list and I didn't realize that the
default reply-to address was set to sender as opposed to the list *sigh*.
Cheers,
Greg Mosier
- Original Message -
From: "Roth, Kevin P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Mosier" &
e has something to say to
someone that is off topic they can switch the email addresses quite easily.
Cheers,
Greg Mosier
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why not a news server?
> >And again, currently this is not very convenient. For exa
sages
based on subject similar to that of the method a news server stores
messages. It's just my opinion, but as far as I can see the only real
advantage to using 'news' instead of a listserv is that you're not wasting
bandwidth on people that aren't even reading the
10 matches
Mail list logo
