Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-14 Thread Max Bowsher
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hallo Max, > > Am Sonntag, 3. August 2003 um 23:08 schriebst du: > >> Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>> Hmm, previous && test version at the same time, I doubt that this is >>> possible. > >> Why do you doubt this? It is entirely possible. > > Well, I can have: > prev: perl-5.6.1-

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-10 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Nicholas, Am Dienstag, 5. August 2003 um 01:56 schriebst du: >>>Also, for 5.8.1, can you turn back on MakeMaker's bzipping of manpages, >>>like you had during the 5.8.0RC's? You might also considier targeting >>>/usr/share/man, as that is what we are hoping to transition to... >> 1. >>

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-08 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Jason Tishler wrote: Nicholas, On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 02:03:02AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: Nicholas Wourms wrote: Perl is required for many operations, and (as I'm sure Chuck will agree) having to rebase a *critical* core application *just* to get it work is unacceptable. Hey, don't drag

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-07 Thread Jason Tishler
Nicholas, On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 02:03:02AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Nicholas Wourms wrote: > >Perl is required for many operations, and (as I'm sure Chuck will > >agree) having to rebase a *critical* core application *just* to get > >it work is unacceptable. > > Hey, don't drag me into

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-04 Thread Charles Wilson
Nicholas Wourms wrote: Perl is required for many operations, and (as I'm sure Chuck will agree) having to rebase a *critical* core application *just* to get it work is unacceptable. Hey, don't drag me into this. Rebase is (currently) a necessary evil for python and maybe perl, but I gave up

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-04 Thread Brian Dessent
Nicholas Wourms wrote: > Plus, I don't care *at all* for > all that colorful shit in XP. It looks like that stuff is part of the > new UI, so the prospects of getting rid of that crap looks slim. FWIW, it's very simple to make all that go away in XP. You just choose the "Windows Classic" set

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-04 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hallo Nicholas, [SNIP] Perl-5.8 is not working at all on WinME and, despite my best efforts, I am unable to debug the problem because the "race" condition happens before the dubugger can hook. As Jason points out in the release notes, even after being rebased, Python ca

pthreads problem under Me (was Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?)

2003-08-04 Thread Jason Tishler
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 12:54:38PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > Perl-5.8 is not working at all on WinME and, despite my best efforts, > I am unable to debug the problem because the "race" condition happens > before the dubugger can hook. As Jason points out in the release > notes, even after be

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-04 Thread Jason Tishler
Gerrit, On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 10:32:58PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Am Sonntag, 3. August 2003 um 18:54 schriebst du: > > As Jason points out in the release notes, even after being rebased, > > Python cannot pass any of the threads or > ^^ Python also cannot be built with Cygwin 1.5.1

OT: flame? (RE: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?)

2003-08-04 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen \(garbage mail\)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Gerrit P. Haase > Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 10:33 PM -- LATE ADDITION -- Before I begin: Please! Don't reply to this. This is just my way of getting some frustration off my shoulders. No offence intended nor implied. -- E.O.A

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-03 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Max, Am Sonntag, 3. August 2003 um 23:08 schriebst du: > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >> Hmm, previous && test version at the same time, I doubt that this is >> possible. > Why do you doubt this? It is entirely possible. Well, I can have: prev: perl-5.6.1-x curr: perl-5.8.0-x test: perl-5.6.1-x

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-03 Thread Max Bowsher
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hmm, previous && test version at the same time, I doubt that this is > possible. Why do you doubt this? It is entirely possible. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation:

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-03 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Nicholas, Am Sonntag, 3. August 2003 um 18:54 schriebst du: > X-Post from cygwin-apps... >> If someone is interested to help, start with release candidate 3 for >> perl-5.8.1: >> http://use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/31/0813206&mode=thread&tid=6 In the meantime is RC4 released, from th

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-03 Thread Nicholas Wourms
X-Post from cygwin-apps... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo Christopher, Am Samstag, 2. August 2003 um 17:23 schriebst du: I'd like to shoot for making 1.5.x the current release on 2003-08-23. Are there any obstacles to that goal? I am still unable to build Perl and I haven't found the problem