Re: Breach of GPL?

2006-08-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:20:39PM +0200, ?yvind Harboe wrote: >On 8/11/06, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:46:57PM +0200, ?yvind Harboe wrote: >>>- They have some partial old version of Cygwin with Nios 5.0/6.0. This >>>causes havoc because Cygwin (sadly) does not support s

Re: Breach of GPL?

2006-08-11 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On 8/11/06, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:46:57PM +0200, ?yvind Harboe wrote: >- They have some partial old version of Cygwin with Nios 5.0/6.0. This >causes havoc because Cygwin (sadly) does not support side-by-side >installs. And, happily, it does no

Re: Breach of GPL?

2006-08-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:46:57PM +0200, ?yvind Harboe wrote: >- They have some partial old version of Cygwin with Nios 5.0/6.0. This >causes havoc because Cygwin (sadly) does not support side-by-side >installs. And, happily, it does not need to. Just use the latest version of Cygwin. For what

RE: Breach of GPL?

2006-08-11 Thread Dave Korn
On 11 August 2006 12:47, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > I was wondering if GPL can't come to the rescue here. > > I've had quite a bit of trouble with Nios 5.0/6.0 because: > > - Altera has not provided the complete source to the modified GCC that > they have for their Nios2 toolchain. Some files are mi

Breach of GPL?

2006-08-11 Thread Øyvind Harboe
I was wondering if GPL can't come to the rescue here. I've had quite a bit of trouble with Nios 5.0/6.0 because: - Altera has not provided the complete source to the modified GCC that they have for their Nios2 toolchain. Some files are missing, others have been (intentially) moved, etc. - They h