On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
> > released. No problems yet.
>
> Same story here, with one exception, discussed later. I used all the latest
> [test] libs, bash, etc at work all day today, rebuilt gcc from cvs
I can build and test gcc HEAD with 1.5.0 and latest (well yesterday's latest)
test packages. The testsuite results are similar to 1.3, but I haven't
checked the output line by line.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problem
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
released. No problems yet.
Same story here, with one exception, discussed later. I used all the latest
[test] libs, bash, etc at work all day today, rebuilt gcc from cvs,
re-autox-ed source trees, ev
> From: Danilo Turina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >>I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
> >>released. No problems yet.
> >
> >
> > Same story here, with one exception, discussed later. I
> used all the latest
> > [test] libs, bash, e
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> The exception: The "-" and "+" keys on the keypad are giving me *two* "-"'s or
> "+"'s at the bash prompt.
Alternate data point to Danilo's: I have 1.5.0 (and bash 2.05b-10) on a
WinXP Pro SP1 Dell laptop, and don't have this problem, with or without
CYGWIN=tty.
--
S
> -Original Message-
> From: Rolf Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu, July 17, 2003 12:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Anyone trying 1.5.0 for anything other than managed mode?
>
>
> I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environ
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
released. No problems yet.
Same story here, with one exception, discussed later. I used all the latest
[test] libs, bash, etc at work all day today, rebuilt gcc from cvs,
re-autox-ed source trees, ev
> I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
> released. No problems yet.
Same story here, with one exception, discussed later. I used all the latest
[test] libs, bash, etc at work all day today, rebuilt gcc from cvs,
re-autox-ed source trees, everything works.
The ex
I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
released. No problems yet. (in fact, I notice the speed improvement
over 1.3.22 -- you know, that sparse file thing).
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Can I take the silence on bug reports for anything other than managed
mode as a good
9 matches
Mail list logo
