Lenik wrote:
> Because of the slow speed, when I'm programming with cygwin, I will
> carefully to invoke command calls to the cygwin executables, to reduce
> the start up cost.
I've sometimes wondered if it would be worth it to have busybox ported
to Cygwin, just to cut out the forking cost for
Lenik wrote on April 29, 2009, at 7:44 PM:
> I feel it has been slightly faster in cygwin-1.7 than cygwin-1.6. But
> it is still very slow compared to msys-1.10. What does cygwin indeed
> execute when start up?
I found that bash-completion slowed startup a LOT. If you have it, you
might try not
Lenik wrote:
I feel it has been slightly faster in cygwin-1.7 than cygwin-1.6. But it
is still very slow compared to msys-1.10. What does cygwin indeed
execute when start up? Is it loaded too much, for example the network
libraries? I noticed that paths leading with two slashes '//', which is
3 matches
Mail list logo
