On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 01:47:43PM -0400, Robb, Sam wrote:
> > Actually that's impossible. That would run contrary to our holy
> > meanness campaign...
>
> Drat! Foiled again. :-)
>
> Unless I can come up with a way to convince you that
> a warning *itself* would be mean... hmm.
I'm all on edg
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Robb, Sam wrote:
> > Actually that's impossible. That would run contrary to our holy
> > meanness campaign...
>
> Drat! Foiled again. :-)
>
> Unless I can come up with a way to convince you that
> a warning *itself* would be mean... hmm.
> -Samrobb
But of course it would be
> Actually that's impossible. That would run contrary to our holy
> meanness campaign...
Drat! Foiled again. :-)
Unless I can come up with a way to convince you that
a warning *itself* would be mean... hmm.
-Samrobb
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem re
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:44:38PM -0400, Robb, Sam wrote:
> Chris et. al.,
>
> I'm sure you already have something like this in
> mind. Could you give those on the mailing list a
> heads up a few days before all the 1.5.0 packages
> migrate from 'test' into 'current'?
>
> I'd appreciate the
Chris et. al.,
I'm sure you already have something like this in
mind. Could you give those on the mailing list a
heads up a few days before all the 1.5.0 packages
migrate from 'test' into 'current'?
I'd appreciate the chance to snag a snapshot of
the last, latest and greatest 1.3.22 packages
5 matches
Mail list logo
