Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-11-01 Thread infoterror
Christopher Faylor-2 wrote: > > I'm not sure if you got my point or not but if you don't develop an > installer which deals with categories and dependencies, then I don't see > how it could be considered a replacement for setup.exe. If you do this, > then you don't need to list all of the pack

RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-11-01 Thread infoterror
Tevfik Karagülle wrote: > > In the first phase, I can think of producing a monolithic > installer for the core environment performing tasks > below: > > - Create basic cygwin registry mountpoints > - untar packages > - run the postinstall script > - Create start menu items and shortcuts (optio

Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:58:09PM +0200, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote: >My intention is to develop an alternative to Cygwin Setup. That means >it must support all dependencies, setup.ini and package repositories >around. > >I've thought that we can have a monolithic installer which installs a >basic en

Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-11 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
ust 11, 2006 5:00 PM To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found] On 11 August 2006 15:30, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: It's also worth noting that the goal here was a subset of Cygwin functionality packaged as a monolithic (no matter how

RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-11 Thread Tevfik Karagülle
lithic installers. Any comments ? Rgrds Tev > -Original Message- > From: Dave Korn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 5:00 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll > was not found] > > On 11 August 2006 15

RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-11 Thread Dave Korn
On 11 August 2006 15:30, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > It's also worth noting that the goal here was a subset of Cygwin > functionality packaged as a monolithic (no matter how small) install. > While the former is a potential supplement to "setup.exe", the latter is a > step backward in terms of

Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-11 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Dave Korn wrote: On 11 August 2006 07:36, Reini Urban wrote: Tevfik Karagülle schrieb: After feedback from cgf, I have scanned setup.ini for packages and their dependencies. 54 of 797 packages are qualified for Base either directly or indirectly: ... I will develop an NSIS package which crea

RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-11 Thread Dave Korn
On 11 August 2006 07:36, Reini Urban wrote: > Tevfik Karagülle schrieb: >> After feedback from cgf, I have scanned setup.ini for packages and >> their dependencies. 54 of 797 packages are qualified for Base either >> directly or indirectly: > ... >> I will develop an NSIS package which creates reg

Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-10 Thread Reini Urban
Tevfik Karagülle schrieb: After feedback from cgf, I have scanned setup.ini for packages and their dependencies. 54 of 797 packages are qualified for Base either directly or indirectly: ... I will develop an NSIS package which creates registry Mount points, untar packages above and run the Post

Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:59:18PM +0200, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote: > I don't know how to switch from digest mode to normal mode. >That's why I think this mail is a little bit out-of-sync. Sorry about that. > >After feedback from cgf, I have scanned setup.ini for packages and >their dependencies. 54

RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-10 Thread infoterror
>According to the setup.exe default package information, >Following 41 packages forms 'a core cygwin environment': I think this kind of thinking makes a lot of sense when dealing with the desktop paradigm, and will empower more users to enjoy the benefits of cygwin. -- View this message in

RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-10 Thread Tevfik Karagülle
cript. Any suggestions including naming are welcome. Rgrds Tev > -Original Message- > From: Tevfik Karagülle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:43 PM > To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'; 'Dave Korn' > Subject: RE: Setup.exe require

Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 09:43:01PM +0200, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote: >Thanks. > >According to the setup.exe default package information, >Following 41 packages forms 'a core cygwin environment': > >--- >Alternatives ash base-files base-passwd bash coreutils >cygwin cygwin-do

RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-10 Thread Tevfik Karagülle
introduce upgrade functionality. Rgrds Tev > -Original Message- > From: Igor Peshansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 6:17 PM > To: Dave Korn > Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll > was not found]

Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-10 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Dave Korn wrote: > On 10 August 2006 14:39, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote: > >> cgf wrote: > >>> Standards such as? A pointer to a free installer which uses Windows > >>> standards and which will handle Cygwin

Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

2006-08-10 Thread Dave Korn
On 10 August 2006 14:39, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote: >> cgf wrote: >>> Standards such as? A pointer to a free installer which uses Windows >>> standards and which will handle Cygwin's needs would be useful, e.g., >>> would NSIS mee