Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:39:33AM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >* Ren? Berber (2006-06-18 23:22 +) >> Linda Walsh wrote: >> [snip] >>>Vim 7 seems to still have a few kinks to work out and doesn't >>> seem nearly as stable as vim64. Since vim7 is already out as vim, >>> maybe vim6.4 could

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

* René Berber (2006-06-18 23:22 +) > Linda Walsh wrote: > [snip] >>Vim 7 seems to still have a few kinks to work out and doesn't >> seem nearly as stable as vim64. Since vim7 is already out as vim, >> maybe vim6.4 could be made available as a separete vim6 or vim64 >> package for those not

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

Linda Walsh wrote: [snip] >Vim 7 seems to still have a few kinks to work out and doesn't > seem nearly as stable as vim64. Since vim7 is already out as vim, > maybe vim6.4 could be made available as a separete vim6 or vim64 > package for those not wanting to be on the bleeding edge? It is ava

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

Corinna Vinschen wrote: I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.0.017-1. This is the long awaited vim 7.0, latest patchlevel 17. Cygwin Vim still builds from the vanilla sources. --- Vim 7 seems to still have a few kinks to work out and doesn't seem nearly as stable as vim64

Re: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

On 12 Jun 2006 17:06:33 -, Reid Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Subject: Re: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1 Luis P Caamano wrote: > Well, almost. After updating I realized that gvim is not included :-( > so I ended up with a vim 7.0 and a gvim 6.4, which is not that useful > it

Re: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

Luis P Caamano wrote: Well, almost. After updating I realized that gvim is not included :-( so I ended up with a vim 7.0 and a gvim 6.4, which is not that useful it seems. Had to go back to 6.4. :-( On 6/12/06, Luis P Caamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/12/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL P

RE: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

Sorry for this: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-06/msg00250.html, just now I have seen vim-7.0.017-2! Thanks, Angelo. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.ht

RE: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

After the upgrade to vim-7.0.017-1: - $ echo $PATH /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/c/texmf/miktex/bin:/c/WINNT/system3 2:/c/WINNT:/c/WINNT/System32/Wbem:/c/Borland/BCC55/Bin:/usr/local/cernlib/2005/b in:/usr/lib/lapack:/

Re: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

Well, almost. After updating I realized that gvim is not included :-( so I ended up with a vim 7.0 and a gvim 6.4, which is not that useful it seems. Had to go back to 6.4. :-( On 6/12/06, Luis P Caamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/12/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I h

RE: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

ECTED] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 1:23 PM To: cygwin-announce@cygwin.com Subject: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1 I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.0.017-1. This is the long awaited vim 7.0, latest patchlevel 17. Cygwin Vim still builds from the vanilla so

Re: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

On 6/12/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.0.017-1. This is the long awaited vim 7.0, latest patchlevel 17. Cygwin Vim still builds from the vanilla sources. Thank you -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA -- Unsubscribe in

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.0.017-1. This is the long awaited vim 7.0, latest patchlevel 17. Cygwin Vim still builds from the vanilla sources. The official release message: === Announcing: Vim (Vi IMpr