On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 09:26, Brian Ford wrote:
> > Setup will do per-version dependencies, but it does so *for the target
> > version*.
> >
> I didn't think version specific dependencies would be needed here. I'm
> obviously not well versed in setup, but I thought that replacing the old
> monolith
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:21, Brian Ford wrote:
> > However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating
> > to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency
> > bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++.
>
> Wha
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:21, Brian Ford wrote:
> However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating
> to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency
> bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++.
What did you put in the setup.hint that makes you think se
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Patrick Eisenacher wrote:
> I faced the same problem. Upgrading from the old monolithic gcc to the
> new separate front end packaged ones only gave me gcc-c. I had to
> separately select gcc-c++.
>
> I'm not sure whether this can be classified as a setup dependency bug,
> sinc
I faced the same problem. Upgrading from the old monolithic gcc to the
new separate front end packaged ones only gave me gcc-c. I had to
separately select gcc-c++.
I'm not sure whether this can be classified as a setup dependency bug,
since you always face this kind of problem when you split up
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Brian P Kasper wrote:
> Thanks, Brian. Your suggestion to look for gcc-g++ pointed me at the answer.
>
> I didn't realize that the backends for GCC don't show up in the
> "partial" view of Cygwin Setup, only the "Not Installed" view.
>
Well, the "partial" view tells you what
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Subject: Re: cc1plus.exe not included
in GCC 3.3.1-3?
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Brian P Kasper wrote:
> cc1plus.exe appears to be missing from gcc 3.3.1-3. I'd been running
> 3.2-3, and all was well. I upgraded to 3.3.1-3 and began experiencing
> the "cannot exec `cc1plus' error. I downgraded to 3.2 and the problem
> ceased. At the end of this message
Folks --
I apologize deeply if this has already been fixed, but I see nothing about it in the
Cygwin list archives or the main Cygwin web page, and there isn't a later version of
gcc-3.3.1 on mirrors.rcn.net yet. I had to unsubscribe from this list for a while to
keep my email S/N down, so
9 matches
Mail list logo