Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 09:26, Brian Ford wrote: > > Setup will do per-version dependencies, but it does so *for the target > > version*. > > > I didn't think version specific dependencies would be needed here. I'm > obviously not well versed in setup, but I thought that replacing the old > monolith

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian Ford
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:21, Brian Ford wrote: > > However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating > > to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency > > bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++. > > Wha

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:21, Brian Ford wrote: > However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating > to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency > bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++. What did you put in the setup.hint that makes you think se

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian Ford
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Patrick Eisenacher wrote: > I faced the same problem. Upgrading from the old monolithic gcc to the > new separate front end packaged ones only gave me gcc-c. I had to > separately select gcc-c++. > > I'm not sure whether this can be classified as a setup dependency bug, > sinc

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Patrick Eisenacher
I faced the same problem. Upgrading from the old monolithic gcc to the new separate front end packaged ones only gave me gcc-c. I had to separately select gcc-c++. I'm not sure whether this can be classified as a setup dependency bug, since you always face this kind of problem when you split up

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian Ford
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Brian P Kasper wrote: > Thanks, Brian. Your suggestion to look for gcc-g++ pointed me at the answer. > > I didn't realize that the backends for GCC don't show up in the > "partial" view of Cygwin Setup, only the "Not Installed" view. > Well, the "partial" view tells you what

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian P Kasper
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: Subject: Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian Ford
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Brian P Kasper wrote: > cc1plus.exe appears to be missing from gcc 3.3.1-3. I'd been running > 3.2-3, and all was well. I upgraded to 3.3.1-3 and began experiencing > the "cannot exec `cc1plus' error. I downgraded to 3.2 and the problem > ceased. At the end of this message

cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian P Kasper
Folks -- I apologize deeply if this has already been fixed, but I see nothing about it in the Cygwin list archives or the main Cygwin web page, and there isn't a later version of gcc-3.3.1 on mirrors.rcn.net yet. I had to unsubscribe from this list for a while to keep my email S/N down, so