Re: difficulties with snapshots

2011-05-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 9 16:02, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote: > Hello, > > This one is a follow-up of http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-05/msg00042.html > > On 2011-05-05 11:19:56 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:47:39AM +0200, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote: > >>2) More importantly, i was not able

Re: difficulties with snapshots

2011-05-09 Thread EXCOFFIER Denis
Hello, This one is a follow-up of http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-05/msg00042.html On 2011-05-05 11:19:56 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:47:39AM +0200, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote: 2) More importantly, i was not able to compile snapshots since about beginning of May, wi

Re: difficulties with snapshots

2011-05-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:47:39AM +0200, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote: >Hi, > >1) It seems that we have management problems with the snapshots. >The last one (indicated 2011-05-04 01:02:18 UTC) belongs in >fact to 2011-05-05, That has been fixed. Thanks for the heads up. and it is more recent than the

Re: difficulties with snapshots

2011-05-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 5 10:47, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote: > Hi, > > 1) It seems that we have management problems with the snapshots. > The last one (indicated 2011-05-04 01:02:18 UTC) belongs in > fact to 2011-05-05, and it is more recent than the preceding > snapshot (indicated yesterday 2011-05-04 06:xx:xx UTC),

difficulties with snapshots

2011-05-05 Thread EXCOFFIER Denis
Hi, 1) It seems that we have management problems with the snapshots. The last one (indicated 2011-05-04 01:02:18 UTC) belongs in fact to 2011-05-05, and it is more recent than the preceding snapshot (indicated yesterday 2011-05-04 06:xx:xx UTC), which has now disappeared (diffs are shown against