On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:25:12AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Mar 10 18:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100,
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:25:12 -0500
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: snapshots revisited
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 10 18:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Fayl
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Mar 10 18:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >>On Mar 10 08:09, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote:
>>
On Mar 10 18:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>On Mar 10 08:09, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote:
> >>>Also that you replace GMT by UT in this snapshot page.
> >>
> >>I gu
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Mar 10 08:09, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote:
>>>Also that you replace GMT by UT in this snapshot page.
>>
>>I guess you mean UTC. Good point. Chris?
>
>No comment.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Mar 10 08:09, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote:
>>Also that you replace GMT by UT in this snapshot page.
>
>I guess you mean UTC. Good point. Chris?
No comment. I *have*, however, filed this under "Nitpicky things that I
can't believe a
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> And finally, since we are talking setup.exe, i've observed that
>> even if you install and install continuously (say: every hour or so),
>> setup.exe continuously installs and installs again several of the
>> src packages (always
On Mar 10 08:09, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote:
> I'd however suggest that the FAQ is brought up to date:
> - remove "You will not be able to replace cygwin1.dll if any
> Cygwin process is running"
> - insist that it does not break the setup.exe mechanism in any way
> (this mechanism that is somewhat m
Hello,
I'm now happy with the snapshots as they are, and i'm ready to use
them more in the future, thank you for them. I'm especially glad that
it has no interaction with the regular setup.exe mechanism: if at some
point a snapshot is not satisfactory, you just have to Reinstall the
regular cygwi
9 matches
Mail list logo