Re: tcl/tk/expect/dejagnu/gdb/insight [Was: Re: [PATCH] Define _TIMEVAL_DEFINED consistently whenever defining timeval.]

2009-09-16 Thread Charles Wilson
Dave Korn wrote: > Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > >>> which, honestly, isn't very much. I'd be concerned about all those >>> tcl-db${old_version} packages -- but it looks like there are no >>> in-distro users of them. That leaves gdb, ruby, python, git, and parrot >>> -- all of which have active main

Re: tcl/tk/expect/dejagnu/gdb/insight [Was: Re: [PATCH] Define _TIMEVAL_DEFINED consistently whenever defining timeval.]

2009-09-16 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 16/09/2009 19:07, Dave Korn wrote: Could we conceivably do coexistence by bringing in the new properly cygwinized versions at version 8.5 and keep the current 8.4 DLLs and /usr/share files around for backward compat? Not AFAIK. The DLLs aren't really the issue as they use different nami

Re: tcl/tk/expect/dejagnu/gdb/insight [Was: Re: [PATCH] Define _TIMEVAL_DEFINED consistently whenever defining timeval.]

2009-09-16 Thread Dave Korn
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> which, honestly, isn't very much. I'd be concerned about all those >> tcl-db${old_version} packages -- but it looks like there are no >> in-distro users of them. That leaves gdb, ruby, python, git, and parrot >> -- all of which have active maintainers. Plus suite3270

Re: tcl/tk/expect/dejagnu/gdb/insight [Was: Re: [PATCH] Define _TIMEVAL_DEFINED consistently whenever defining timeval.]

2009-09-16 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 14/09/2009 18:14, Charles Wilson wrote: Anway, tcl-8.5.6 and tk-8.5.6 built easily on a bog-standard cygwin-1.7 system using the cygports derived from the Cygwin Ports project. I couldn't just use the Cygwin Ports binaries because IIRC they depend on other Cygwin Ports packages not available i

Re: tcl/tk/expect/dejagnu/gdb/insight [Was: Re: [PATCH] Define _TIMEVAL_DEFINED consistently whenever defining timeval.]

2009-09-16 Thread Charles Wilson
Charles Wilson wrote: > As an aside, 'gdbtui' is kinda neat; I'd never used that before even > though it has long been part of cgf's gdb packages. Oh, and one last thing I forgot. Perhaps the *simplest* compromise, that allows us to (a) switch the "main" cygwin distribution to use X-based tcl/tk,

Re: tcl/tk/expect/dejagnu/gdb/insight [Was: Re: [PATCH] Define _TIMEVAL_DEFINED consistently whenever defining timeval.]

2009-09-16 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:01:44PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >>From this thread: >> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-08/msg00089.html >> I thought most people either were in favor of, or at least not opposed >> to, "fixing" the */tk/*/insight issue by switching t

tcl/tk/expect/dejagnu/gdb/insight [Was: Re: [PATCH] Define _TIMEVAL_DEFINED consistently whenever defining timeval.]

2009-09-14 Thread Charles Wilson
Redirected from cygwin-patches: Dave Korn wrote: > Granted that the whole _TIMEVAL_DEFINED/__USE_W32_SOCKETS thing is basically > an ugly and undesirable hack, but until we have a plan to fix the whole > tcl/tk/expect/dejagnu/gdb/insight combo (as well as gnat), I figure we have to > live with it,