Re: antiword-0.34

On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hallo Igor, > > http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/antiword-0.34-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/antiword-0.34-1.tar.bz2 > http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/setup.hint > > > I've looked at the binary and source packages.

Re: cvs cleanup.

Robert Collins wrote: > So: > setup module on sources.redhat.com... > maxb owns these incorrectly modded files. > ConnectionSetting.h > SourceSetting.h fixed. Max.

cvs cleanup.

So: setup module on sources.redhat.com... maxb owns these incorrectly modded files. ConnectionSetting.h SourceSetting.h Rob -- GPG key available at: . signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

There has been a new release of the official cmake (1.8.1). This is a major release from 1.6.7 to 1.8.1. Changes from 1.8.0 to 1.8.1 Added initial support for MinGW builds on Windows. Fixed a couple bugs in the ctest program. Some fixes to the FindThreads and FindwxWindows modules. A fix to the C

Re: [forwarded email: cygwin mirrors and installation]

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:28:44AM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: >Do "we" actually have information on where the different mirrors are? For all >of them? Yes. cgf

RE: Setup disabling of nonexistent virus scanners

> On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 21:33, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > I don't understand. In proppage.{h,cc} (the base class) and in any > overrides > > (i.e. root and AntiVirus) both I and CVS have: > > > > virtual bool wantsActivation() const [etc...] > > CVS was missing the const. See the most rece

RE: Setup disabling of nonexistent virus scanners

On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 21:33, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > I don't understand. In proppage.{h,cc} (the base class) and in any overrides > (i.e. root and AntiVirus) both I and CVS have: > > virtual bool wantsActivation() const [etc...] CVS was missing the const. See the most recent commit to prop

RE: Setup disabling of nonexistent virus scanners

> On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 11:32, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > Hmmm, yeah, I'll look at this. I wonder why I don't get this and (I assume) > > others don't > > Incorrect const clause on wantsActivation in the base class lead to > inconsistent method signatures. I don't understand. In proppag

Re: [forwarded email: cygwin mirrors and installation]

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:35:24PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 13:02, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > You'll have to forgive my ignorance here, but is there some way to query > > ftp/http servers for how much load they're under? > > Not as a standard. > > Thinking out l

Re: Setup disabling of nonexistent virus scanners

On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 11:32, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > Hmmm, yeah, I'll look at this. I wonder why I don't get this and (I assume) > others don't Incorrect const clause on wantsActivation in the base class lead to inconsistent method signatures. I fixed this this morning, but have been rus

RE: [ITP] distcc

Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote: > On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Daniel Reed wrote: > >> On 2003-10-06T15:20+0100, Morrison, John wrote: work appended stuff >> Can you clarify this note, or was its inclusion a mistake? Any >> message sent to the cygwin-apps mailing list will be archived and >> made publicly

RE: [forwarded email: cygwin mirrors and installation]

On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 13:02, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > You'll have to forgive my ignorance here, but is there some way to query > ftp/http servers for how much load they're under? Not as a standard. Thinking out loud, what we roughly want is: -users can choose any mirror explicitly. -on the f