Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2009-01-08 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Daniel R. Grayson wrote: > Yaakov said I should submit ITP's for those dependent libraries, and that the > question of interest in Macaulay2 is moot until then, but you say I don't have > to submit ITP's for them, because they are either already prov

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2009-01-08 Thread Daniel R. Grayson
e". > Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:30:11 +0100 > From: Corinna Vinschen > To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1 > > On Jan 7 19:42, Daniel R. Grayson wrote: > > You must be reading her message differently from the way I did. > > Yaakov got the

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2009-01-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 7 19:42, Daniel R. Grayson wrote: > You must be reading her message differently from the way I did. Yaakov got the message basically right. I used the gc package as an unfortunate example but this doesn't invalidate the fact that it would be much more feasible to have the extra libs your

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2009-01-07 Thread Daniel R. Grayson
gwin-apps@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1 ... > > On 14 November, Corinna explained[1] that you (or someone else) will > need to ITP the yet-unpackaged dependencies as well before this can be > seriously considered. AFAICS that hasn't happened yet, so I think t

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2009-01-07 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Daniel R. Grayson wrote: > I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no positive > votes since then. I would have thought that by now, if there were any > interest > in having it in cygwin, there would have been a positive vot

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2009-01-07 Thread Daniel R. Grayson
> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:14:26 -0500 > From: Christopher Faylor > To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1 > Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:04:39PM -0600, Daniel R. Grayson wrote: > >I submitted an ITP for Mac

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2009-01-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:14:26PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >I don't see it in Fedora 10 but it looks like it was included in the >"extras" package for older Fedoras. ...But this does not automatically qualify Macaulay2 for inclusion in the Cygwin distribution. cgf

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2009-01-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:04:39PM -0600, Daniel R. Grayson wrote: >I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no >positive votes since then. I would have thought that by now, if there >were any interest in having it in cygwin, there would have been a >positive vote. I unders

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2009-01-07 Thread Daniel R. Grayson
Dear Cygwin, I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no positive votes since then. I would have thought that by now, if there were any interest in having it in cygwin, there would have been a positive vote. I understand that 5 are required. As I said before, Macaulay 2

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2008-11-17 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Daniel R Grayson writes: > Dear Cygwin, > We'd like to distribute Macaulay 2 as an official cygwin package. The package > is used by hundreds of mathematicians as part of their research, and hundreds > of published research papers, listed on our web site have cited it. I

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2008-11-14 Thread Reini Urban
2008/11/13 Corinna: > Yes, definitely. I'm not familiar with this stuff at all, so I would be > glad if some other maintainer (Reini? You're mathomatica maintainer so > you might have some affinity...) would take a look. Sorry, I'm terribly busy at work, and only have my laptop around. -- Reini

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2008-11-14 Thread Daniel R. Grayson
That's the one, thanks! > Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:00:18 -0600 > From: "Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1 > Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: &

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2008-11-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 14 03:00, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > The gc package at least might be useful for others as well. > > If by gc you mean the Boehm-Demers-Weiser garbage collector library, > it's already packaged as libgc.

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2008-11-14 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > The gc package at least might be useful for others as well. If by gc you mean the Boehm-Demers-Weiser garbage collector library, it's already packaged as libgc. Yaakov -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2008-11-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 13 12:16, Daniel R. Grayson wrote: > > PS: Macaulay2 depends on various other 3rd party packages, which are not yet > set up as cygwin packages, namely: singular-factory, gc, singular-libfac, and > ntl. Ouch. > I don't suppose someone has come forward to create those packages... > > Ou

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2008-11-13 Thread Daniel R. Grayson
PS: Macaulay2 depends on various other 3rd party packages, which are not yet set up as cygwin packages, namely: singular-factory, gc, singular-libfac, and ntl. I don't suppose someone has come forward to create those packages... Our Makefile is set up to automatically download the source code

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2008-11-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 13 08:23, Daniel R. Grayson wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:52:16 -0600 > > From: "Daniel R. Grayson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com > > Subject: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1 > > ... > > > It is not included

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2008-11-13 Thread Daniel R. Grayson
> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:52:16 -0600 > From: "Daniel R. Grayson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com > Subject: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1 ... > It is not included in a major Linux distribution. Oops, no, I was wrong. It seems to be included in Fedora

[ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

2008-11-11 Thread Daniel R. Grayson
Dear Cygwin, We'd like to distribute Macaulay 2 as an official cygwin package. The package is used by hundreds of mathematicians as part of their research, and hundreds of published research papers, listed on our web site have cited it. It has been developed over the years through generous fund

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2

2006-06-12 Thread Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Grayson wrote: > There have been no replies to my message below. Does a lack of interest from > this mailing list mean our proposed package is unlikely to be accepted, and > thus I should expend no effort releasing our program in the cygwin format

Re: [ITP] Macaulay2

2006-06-12 Thread Dan Grayson
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com > Subject: [ITP] Macaulay2 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com > > > I'd like to put together Macaulay2 as a cygwin package. Macaulay2 is a > software system devoted to supp

[ITP] Macaulay2

2006-05-19 Thread Dan Grayson
I'd like to put together Macaulay2 as a cygwin package. Macaulay2 is a software system devoted to supporting research in algebraic geometry and commutative algebra, whose development has been funded by the National Science Foundation. It would go in the Math section of your setup menu, and is si