Re: [Ready for test/1.5.0] libiconv & gettext (many)

On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:57:56PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > localedir = bindtextdomain (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR); > > ... > > puts (localedir); > > > > Am I right here? I had not much to do with libintl so far so please > > excuse my questions. > > No, I think

Re: [Ready for test/1.5.0] libiconv & gettext (many)

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 08:42:04PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>Real fix: figure out why sharutils thinks it needs access to that >>variable, and use the public API to do the same thing. If possible. > > > shar just uses the value to print it to stdout if the opti

Re: [Ready for test/1.5.0] libiconv & gettext (many)

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 08:42:04PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Real fix: figure out why sharutils thinks it needs access to that > variable, and use the public API to do the same thing. If possible. shar just uses the value to print it to stdout if the option --print-text-domain-dir is given.

Re: [Ready for test/1.5.0] libiconv & gettext (many)

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > trying to build sharutils for 1.5.0, I've just came across a problem: > > gcc -o shar shar.o encode.o ../lib/libshar.a ../lib/libshar.a -lintl -lintl > shar.o(.text+0x5523): In function `main': > /home/corinna/src/sharutils-4.2.1/src/shar.c:1970: > undefined

Re: [Ready for test/1.5.0] libiconv & gettext (many)

Charles, On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:32:55AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > These two package-sets should be updated together. > > libiconv-1.9.1-1 > libiconv2-1.9.1-1 > libcharset1-1.9.1-1 > > gettext-0.12.1-1 > gettext-devel-0.12.1-1 > libintl2-0.12.1-1 > libgettextpo0-0.12.1-1 (*) trying to b

Re: [Ready for test/1.5.0] libiconv & gettext (many)

On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 18:47, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 14 Jul 2003 18:37:21 +1000, "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 18:32, Charles Wilson wrote: > > > > > Because we > > > do not have versioned requires AFAIK > > > > We do. Not extensively tested, but see

Re: [Ready for test/1.5.0] libiconv & gettext (many)

On 14 Jul 2003 18:37:21 +1000, "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 18:32, Charles Wilson wrote: > > > Because we > > do not have versioned requires AFAIK > > We do. Not extensively tested, but see the setup homepage for the > syntax. Should I use it, in this case

Re: [Ready for test/1.5.0] libiconv & gettext (many)

On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 18:32, Charles Wilson wrote: > Because we > do not have versioned requires AFAIK We do. Not extensively tested, but see the setup homepage for the syntax. Rob -- GPG key available at: . signature.asc Description: This i

[Ready for test/1.5.0] libiconv & gettext (many)

These two package-sets should be updated together. libiconv-1.9.1-1 libiconv2-1.9.1-1 libcharset1-1.9.1-1 gettext-0.12.1-1 gettext-devel-0.12.1-1 libintl2-0.12.1-1 libgettextpo0-0.12.1-1 (*) (*) new library package -- gettext-devel now depends on it. Because we do not have versioned requires AF