On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 18:34:36 +0900, Lemures Lemniscati
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:32:37 +0100, Achim Gratz
> > >> > And, choices for a tree-prefix where luarocks will install rocks are:
> > >> > 1) luarocks_tree=/usr/share/lua/luarocks
> >
> > That only makes sense if luarocks aren't architecture sp
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:32:37 +0100, Achim Gratz
> Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes:
> >> > I've understood that we should avoid /usr/local.
>
> Specifically we should avoid to put files or directories there, so if
> you ever envision to have luarocks wrapped up as Cygwin packages that is
Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes:
>> > I've understood that we should avoid /usr/local.
Specifically we should avoid to put files or directories there, so if
you ever envision to have luarocks wrapped up as Cygwin packages that is
definitiely the wrong place for them to end up at. OTOH,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:38:33 -0700, Brian Inglis
> On 2021-02-24 04:03, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:53:08 -0700, Brian Inglis
> >> On 2021-02-23 22:20, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >>> On 24.02.2021 05:18, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
On 2021-02-24 04:03, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:53:08 -0700, Brian Inglis
On 2021-02-23 22:20, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On 24.02.2021 05:18, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:15:38 +0900, Lemures Lemniscati
On Sat
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:53:08 -0700, Brian Inglis
> On 2021-02-23 22:20, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > On 24.02.2021 05:18, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:15:38 +0900, Lemures Lemniscati
> >>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 08:40:33 +0100, Achim Gratz
> Lem
On 2021-02-23 22:20, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On 24.02.2021 05:18, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:15:38 +0900, Lemures Lemniscati
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 08:40:33 +0100, Achim Gratz
Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes:
* A new source luarocks pro
On 24.02.2021 05:18, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:15:38 +0900, Lemures Lemniscati
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 08:40:33 +0100, Achim Gratz
Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes:
* A new source luarocks provides lua53- and lua54-luarocks.
They install rocks int
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:15:38 +0900, Lemures Lemniscati
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 08:40:33 +0100, Achim Gratz
> > Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes:
> > > * A new source luarocks provides lua53- and lua54-luarocks.
> > > They install rocks into an alternative tree /var/lib/lua-site/.
> >
> >
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 08:40:33 +0100, Achim Gratz
> Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes:
> > * A new source luarocks provides lua53- and lua54-luarocks.
> > They install rocks into an alternative tree /var/lib/lua-site/.
>
> That looks wrong to me, I'd have expected
>
> /usr/share/lua/luaro
Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes:
> * A new source luarocks provides lua53- and lua54-luarocks.
> They install rocks into an alternative tree /var/lib/lua-site/.
That looks wrong to me, I'd have expected
/usr/share/lua/luarocks
or maybe /usr/local as a prefix depending on how much emp
Hi!
Helped by advices from Achim [1],
I prepared an experimental tree for Lua [2], as a first step.
And I'd like to request for comments about it.
* lua is forked into lua54 and lua53. It is also obsoleted by lua53.
we can select versions by alternatives
* A new source luarocks provides lua53-
12 matches
Mail list logo