Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 10 11:19, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
So, I was right (rather than 'disregardable'). And that's from the horse's
mouth, so to speak. Which brings back my query: is there a free but not
GPL version of the X client libraries
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:59:00PM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
>>Oh, please don't. This is a simple concept. There is nothing
>>complicated here.
>>
>If you build your program using Cygwin's gcc then your program is
>GPLed regardless of whether it is using X11 libraries.
>
>-m-no-cygwin?
In t
> Oh, please don't. This is a simple concept. There is nothing
complicated here.
>
> If you build your program using Cygwin's gcc then your program is
GPLed regardless of whether it is using X11 libraries.
-m-no-cygwin?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIUseGPLToolsForNF
-Richard Cam
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Eliah Kagan wrote:
For the record (especially since issues of attributed accuracy are
being raised later in the thread) I did not write the following:
hmm - go back and count the ">" marks (I didn't misquote anything, as
your text illustrates well enough ;-)
--
Thomas E.
On 11/10/05, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
>
> > Eliah Kagan wrote:
> > There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but what if
> > you cant put your app under GPL? Is there a pure mingw port of the X11
> > client
> > lib?
>
> The X11 client
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:53:54AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
>Michel Bardiaux wrote:
>> Thomas Dickey wrote:
>>>(Perhaps you should discuss this on the regular cygwin mailing
>list).
>>
>>Not really possible, the trafic there is way too much for the time I
>have.
>
>Perhaps you should discuss
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Brian Dessent wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
The X library source is not GPL. Likewise ncurses.
Stating that it is "effectively" GPL is at best misleading,
since it is possible for someone to take the same source
to a different place and use it without cygwin.
The word "ef
Thomas Dickey wrote:
> The X library source is not GPL. Likewise ncurses.
> Stating that it is "effectively" GPL is at best misleading,
> since it is possible for someone to take the same source
> to a different place and use it without cygwin.
The word "effectively" might be misleading to you b
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I'm really wondering what you're up to. Michel's choice of words might
You shouldn't have to wonder if you read my response rather than
cut/paste from a boilerplate response regarding the cygwin dll.
The X library source is not GPL. Likewise ncur
On Nov 10 11:19, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
>
> >So, I was right (rather than 'disregardable'). And that's from the horse's
> >mouth, so to speak. Which brings back my query: is there a free but not
> >GPL version of the X client libraries for Win32?
>
>
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
So, I was right (rather than 'disregardable'). And that's from the horse's
mouth, so to speak. Which brings back my query: is there a free but not GPL
version of the X client libraries for Win32?
rofl
I have a better suggestion: since you don't und
Darryl wrote:
So, I was right (rather than 'disregardable'). And that's from the
horse's mouth, so to speak. Which brings back my query: is there a
free but not GPL version of the X client libraries for Win32?
Microsoft's Software Services For UNIX 3.5 available for free download.
As I wr
So, I was right (rather than 'disregardable'). And that's from the horse's
mouth, so to speak. Which brings back my query: is there a free but not
GPL version of the X client libraries for Win32?
Microsoft's Software Services For UNIX 3.5 available for free download. As
I wrote earlier it d
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 10 12:15, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Eliah Kagan wrote:
There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but
wh
On Nov 10 12:15, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
> Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
> >
> >>Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
> >>>
> Eliah Kagan wrote:
> There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but
Michel Bardiaux wrote:
>
> Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >
> > (Perhaps you should discuss this on the regular cygwin mailing
list).
>
> Not really possible, the trafic there is way too much for the time I
have.
Perhaps you should discuss this on the cygwin-licensing list, which is:
1) Designed specific
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
I assume you refer to the cygwin FAQ:
I'm aware of it. Looks like you read this, but still don't understand it.
Possibly. It is also possible I *do* understand it, just not the same
way you do. What is
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
I assume you refer to the cygwin FAQ:
I'm aware of it. Looks like you read this, but still don't understand it.
(Perhaps you should discuss this on the regular cygwin mailing list).
But I am not sure it can be applied to a situ
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Eliah Kagan wrote:
There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but
what if you cant put your app under GPL? Is there a pure mingw port
of t
At 04:09 10/11/2005, you wrote:
Hi,
can you pls tell me how I can port existing x windows
application to win32? Is there any tool that does this
or do I have to replace the X11 API with win32 API
manually?
Thanks,
Mehnaz
We have ported large X apps from Unix / Linux onto Cygwin using a
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Eliah Kagan wrote:
There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but what
if you cant put your app under GPL? Is there a pure mingw port of the X11
client lib?
T
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Eliah Kagan wrote:
There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but
what if you cant put your app under GPL? Is there a pure mingw port of
the X11 client lib?
The X11 client libraries aren't GPL.
No, but
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Eliah Kagan wrote:
There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but what if
you cant put your app under GPL? Is there a pure mingw port of the X11 client
lib?
The X11 client libraries aren't GPL.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invis
TED] On Behalf Of Mehnaz Farooqui
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 9:39 AM
> To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
> Subject: port existing x windows application to win32
>
>
> Hi,
>
> can you pls tell me how I can port existing x windows
> application to win32? Is there an
Eliah Kagan wrote:
On 11/9/05, Mehnaz Farooqui wrote:
Hi,
can you pls tell me how I can port existing x windows
application to win32? Is there any tool that does this
or do I have to replace the X11 API with win32 API
manually?
Thanks,
Mehnaz
Since there are X servers for Windows (like
On 11/9/05, Mehnaz Farooqui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you pls tell me how I can port existing x windows
> application to win32? Is there any tool that does this
> or do I have to replace the X11 API with win32 API
> manually?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mehnaz
Since there are X ser
Hi,
can you pls tell me how I can port existing x windows
application to win32? Is there any tool that does this
or do I have to replace the X11 API with win32 API
manually?
Thanks,
Mehnaz
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors
27 matches
Mail list logo
