On 06.08.2017 11:04, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 08/06/2017 05:00 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> I am currently testing the updated patch on armel, armhf and
>> m68k. If it succeeds, it should be included for the next upload
>> and the workaround for m68k from #868255 [1].
>
> .
On 08/06/2017 05:29 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> ... the workaround for #868255 should be removed and Zero should
>> be enabled on armhf as well. I was just interrupted writing the
>> bug report during the first DebConf talk :).
>
> armhf builds hotspot by default.
Yes, but it has Zero disabled.
On 08/06/2017 05:00 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I am currently testing the updated patch on armel, armhf and
> m68k. If it succeeds, it should be included for the next upload
> and the workaround for m68k from #868255 [1].
... the workaround for #868255 should be removed and Zero should
Source: openjdk-9
Version: 9~b181-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: armel armhf m68k
Hi!
The patch jdk-8067331.diff is obviously broken since it patches the
functions Atomic::xchg and Atomic::xchg_ptr to not return the values
of arm_lock_test_and_set and m
4 matches
Mail list logo