Bug#226131: problem with patch

2004-03-08 Thread Dave O
I don't know why, but this patch is causing mod_perl to segfault for me. Backing out to 1.29.0.1-5 causes the crashes to stop, and as far as I can see this was the only change to the mod_perl code between the 2 versions I do use PerlSetVar in several VirtualHosts, none of which are '0'. Thanks

Re: Bug#236757: apache: postinst script fails

2004-03-08 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote: La plume légère, vers Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 06:39:28AM +0100, heure d'inspiration, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto écrivait en ces mots: Hi Wolfgang, according to ucf documentation --debconf-ok is supported from version 0.28 and there is a

Re: Bug#236757: apache: postinst script fails

2004-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Sourdeau
La plume légère, vers Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 06:39:28AM +0100, heure d'inspiration, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto écrivait en ces mots: Hi Wolfgang, according to ucf documentation --debconf-ok is supported from version 0.28 and there is a specific dependency on it in apache-common. Can you

[Virus detected]

2004-03-08 Thread MailMonitor_on_Grupo_Giro
Sophos Plc MailMonitor for Domino/D R1.0(4.003c) Server: Grupo Giro --- Your email contained infected attachment(s). For advice consult your system administrator.

Bug#236778: apache: Postinst script still fail

2004-03-08 Thread Sythos
Package: apache Version: 1.3.29.0.2-1 Severity: minor From 1.3.29.0.1 postinst generate some error, but apache start clean: Setting up apache (1.3.29.0.2-1) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/apache ... Installing new version of config file /etc/logrotate.d/apache ...

Bug#236778: marked as done (apache: Postinst script still fail)

2004-03-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:08:42 +0100 (CET) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#236778: apache: Postinst script still fail has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

apache_1.3.29.0.2-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-03-08 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: apache-common_1.3.29.0.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-common_1.3.29.0.2-2_i386.deb apache-dbg_1.3.29.0.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-dbg_1.3.29.0.2-2_i386.deb apache-dev_1.3.29.0.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-dev_1.3.29.0.2-2_all.deb

Bug#236760: marked as done (Particularily verbose postinst, and a bit scary at that)

2004-03-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 Mar 2004 05:17:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#236760: fixed in apache 1.3.29.0.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

vers 1.3.29.0.2-1

2004-03-08 Thread Peter J Thompson
when upgrading to1.3.29.0.2-1, package writes additional files to /etc/apache/conf.d with .dist attachment preventing apache from starting - removing files makes everything ok -- regards peter

Re: vers 1.3.29.0.2-1

2004-03-08 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Hi Peter, know problem. It is already fixed in -2 (uploaded this morning) Fabio On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Peter J Thompson wrote: when upgrading to1.3.29.0.2-1, package writes additional files to /etc/apache/conf.d with .dist attachment preventing apache from starting - removing files

Bug#135717: severity is incorrect

2004-03-08 Thread Michael Stone
severity 135717 important quit The fact that the conf.d scanning code doesn't ignore .dpkg files can cause severe breakage when upgrading. (E.g., if you change the mod ssl config file apache will refuse to start the next time you upgrade because it tries to bind to port 443 twice, once in your

Re: Bug#135717: severity is incorrect

2004-03-08 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
severity 135717 normal stop Inflating severities when not necessary is quite annoying. The fact that the conf.d scanning code doesn't ignore .dpkg files can cause severe breakage when upgrading. Feel free to provide a patch to support file exclusion. If upstream did not implement it isn't

Processed: severity is incorrect

2004-03-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 135717 important Bug#135717: apache: Include directory directive should support exclusion of certain file patterns Bug#233538: apache: dotfiles not skipped, scanning /etc/apache/conf.d Severity set to `important'. quit Stopping processing

Bug#135717: severity is incorrect

2004-03-08 Thread Michael Stone
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:01:32PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: Inflating severities when not necessary is quite annoying. Deflating severities without good rationale is equally annoying. By not calling it critical I was being moderate. The fact that the conf.d scanning code doesn't ignore

patch to implement run-part-ish behaviour

2004-03-08 Thread Thom May
Hi, as noted on irc, we should exclude .dpkg-* files, and also dot-files etc. This is a patch to do this; please can you review,test and confirm it seems valid? (I don't have a way to commit on debian-apache, so please apply if it looks good.) -Thom Index: src/main/http_config.c

未承諾広告※

2004-03-08 Thread 無料で紹介します。
$B!c;v6H

Bug#236882: Seg fault upon attempting to start apache-perl

2004-03-08 Thread Jamie Lawrence
Package: apache-perl Version: 1.3.29.0.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Exact message returned: scylla:/etc/apache-perl# apache-perl-ctl configtest /usr/sbin/apache-perl-ctl: line 171: 8867 Segmentation fault $HTTPD -t -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#236882: apache-perl: Segmentation fault on 'use HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler'

2004-03-08 Thread Adam Sjøgren
Package: apache-perl Version: 1.3.29.0.2-1 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #236882 I just upgraded from older versions of libhtml-mason-perl and apache-perl in unstable to the latest. When running apache-perl I get a segmentation fault. I've narrowed it down to this minimal example: $ cd

Bug#236882: Bug#236887: libhtml-mason-perl: Segmentation fault when saying use HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler; with apache-perl

2004-03-08 Thread Steven Haslam
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 18:52, Adam Sjøgren wrote: Package: libhtml-mason-perl Version: 1:1.25-2 Severity: important Tags: sid I just upgraded from older versions of libhtml-mason-perl and apache-perl in unstable to the latest. When running apache-perl I get a segmentation fault. I've

Bug#236882: apache-perl: I can reproduce this segfault as well

2004-03-08 Thread Dave Rolsky
Package: apache-perl Version: 1.3.29.0.2-1 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #236882 I've tracked it down to this bit of code in HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler my $c = $r ? $r : Apache-server; @val = HAS_TABLE_API ? $c-dir_config-get($p) : $c-dir_config($p); It's the call to -dir_config

Bug#236932: mf typo in /usr/share/apache/postinst.common

2004-03-08 Thread Norbert Kiesel
Package: apache Version: 1.3.29.0.2-2 Severity: important Tags: sid Hi, /usr/share/apache/postinst.common has a typo (mf instead of mv) which results in calling metafont. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1,

Bug#236882: apache-perl: The patch from bug 226131 is the culprit!

2004-03-08 Thread Dave Rolsky
Package: apache-perl Version: 1.3.29.0.2-1 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #236882 I rebuilt the apache packages from the Debian source without the patch provided in bug report 226131, and it starts up fine. Looking at the code being patched, I have absolutely no idea why it would cause a

Bug#236882: apache-perl: The patch from bug 226131 is the culprit!

2004-03-08 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Dave Rolsky wrote: patch may just be incorrect. It's testing if if RETVAL is SvOK, but _all_ SVs are SvOK, whether they are the Nullsv global, or a new SV created via newSV! I take it back. Nullsv should not be SvOK, and I'm not so sure about newSV, looking at the core

#1055;#1086;#1079;#1076;#1088;#1072;#1074;#1083;#1103;#1077;#1084; #1089; 8 #1052;#1072;#1088;#1090;#1072;!

2004-03-08 Thread spaceman
- Alfa-Bank, Lukoil . Audi,IBM ,C-Boss,SGS,,Intermark .. . - . students. - 9 . . . ?? 995 -82-41 c.

trouble with install APACHE-SSL 1.3.290.2-2

2004-03-08 Thread Andreas
Hi there, Hi i just installed new apache-ssl 1.3.29.0.2-2 and can not enter into HTTPS site - i was use old config file ...and can`t i was there use auth files , group users ... and i stert experimet with new package first - remove /etc/apache-ssl/ and start install again and i get this :