On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:24:13PM +0200, Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
it seems there is a potential buffer overflow in Apache's mod_proxy.
Are you aware of it ?
What I believe I heard from our Apache maintainers was that this would only
crash the
Hi bro
I have toubles with police now :( they installed
something on my computer and spy on me
Download this program
http://www.rewtb.privacykeeper.info/ip/
and check your computer ASAP
tag 255930 moreinfo
tag 255930 unreproducible
stop
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, C.Y.M. wrote:
Package: apache-common
Version: 1.3.31-1
Change Request: apache-modconf fails to disable modules in apache and
apache-ssl
For Example: When I type apache-modconf apache-ssl disable
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, C.Y.M. wrote:
I have followed your instructions and first listed the contents of
modules.conf in apache-ssl. Then I added mod_imap. Next, I listed the
new contents of modules.conf (and mod_imap was there). Finally, I was able
to remove mod_imap and it was no longer in
I have followed your instructions and first listed the contents of
modules.conf in apache-ssl. Then I added mod_imap. Next, I listed the
new contents of modules.conf (and mod_imap was there). Finally, I was able
to remove mod_imap and it was no longer in the modules.conf. But, this
appears to
Hello,
Please close this bug. This was apparently user error. I was able to remove
mod_proxy_add_forward by typing:
nofear:/etc/apache-ssl# apache-modconf apache-ssl disable proxy_add_forward
Im sorry for the trouble. It appears what was happening was the embedded
name of the module was not
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:33:30 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#255930: apache-modconf fails to disable modules
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hi bro
I have toubles with police now :( they installed
something on my computer and spy on me
Download this program
http://www.ultnf.privacykeeper.info/ip/
and check your computer ASAP
da 22.6. - 25.6.2004 som neprtomn z dvodu erpania dovolenky, zastupuje ma
p.Zdenka Rybrov
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
i'm thinking to leave libapache-mod-ssl to the debian-apache team.
anybody is interested?
it is in pretty good shape but more care would surely make it better.
Is there any specific reason
apache_1.3.31-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apache_1.3.31-2.dsc
apache_1.3.31-2.diff.gz
apache-doc_1.3.31-2_all.deb
apache-dev_1.3.31-2_all.deb
apache_1.3.31-2_i386.deb
apache-ssl_1.3.31-2_i386.deb
apache-perl_1.3.31-2_i386.deb
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:32:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#250408: fixed in apache 1.3.31-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:32:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#199045: fixed in apache 1.3.31-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:32:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#251048: fixed in apache 1.3.31-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
apache-common_1.3.31-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/apache/apache-common_1.3.31-2_i386.deb
apache-dbg_1.3.31-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/apache/apache-dbg_1.3.31-2_i386.deb
apache-dev_1.3.31-2_all.deb
to pool/main/a/apache/apache-dev_1.3.31-2_all.deb
apache-doc_1.3.31-2_all.deb
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
apache-perl_1.3.31-2_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Hello,
I am the coordinator of the packaging effort for RRFW, a Round Robin
Database Framework, which is a collection of Perl scripts for data
acquisition and monitoring (ITP #186828). It uses apache for displaying
the collected data. It utilizes mod_perl, so in the postinst script I have
to
Package: libapr0
Version: 2.0.49
Severity: normal
If I set up an apr_shmem segment on my Debian GNU/Linux system, and the
master process that set up the segment crashes without closing it, the
segment sticks around until I reboot.
I'm using a file named libbtt.shm to back the segment on the
18 matches
Mail list logo
