Re: the next step

> I feel that the design discussions have reached the point where we'll be > more productive if we're talking about actual code. There are still many Please create a picture of the layout/concept/modules. An picture says more then 1000 Thanks, Hartmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Re: Alternative root filesystem support

/developerworks/opensource/linux/ (xfs) http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ (reiserfs) http://devlinux.com/projects/reiserfs/ (off-topic, only for infos) (netwarefs) http://www.timpanogas.com/ (codafs) http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/ (udfs) http://trylinux.com/projects/udf/ Greetings, Hartmut --

Re: Alternative root filesystem support

> Let's add one more bullet point for the new installer--namely, > alternative root filesystem support. I and my colleagues would just > love to see ReiserFS support in woody's installer. Why reiserfs? reiserfs is the bad guy, it doesen't support other architectures then intel and only the 32 b

Re: redesigning the debian installer

modules, talk about it and it is useful for the documentation. Thanks, Hartmut -- Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Hartmut Koptein | Debian Maintainer and Porter Tel.: 0178-koptein (0178-5678346)| Use Debian GNU/Linux! Non-Commercial Emails: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: redesigning the debian installer

Hi, > Modules > --- > Retrievers > -- > The Installer UI > > The user's view > --- > > After the kernel boots up, the first thing the user will see is whatever UI > is being used, configuring itself. This is equivalent to the current > installer asking if

Re: [woody,debinst] Interim filesystem

> > disadvantages: > >ext3 isn't a real journalingfs or better: it hasen't the ful > > power. Forget ext3. > > Do you mean "it doesn't do metadata-only journaling"? Perhaps you > mean "it's not finished". Yes; it was only the current state. > > >xfs is non-free stuff > > Pe

Re: [woody,debinst] Interim filesystem

> > And what about raiserfs or better jfs ? > > > > I havent tried reiserfs yet, from what i know it save us a bit of space > with small files wouldnt it, does it have nay other advantages ? > > Whats jfs? jfs is the journaling-file-system from ibm -- the aix filesystem without the LVM. We h

Re: [woody,debinst] Interim filesystem

> > > How and Interim filesystem might work (as i see it) > > > > Why have an interim fs? And what about raiserfs or better jfs ? Hartmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]