-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/03/13 08:19, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
>
>> What we need is someone who can reliably reproduce the issue and help
>> with debugging.
>
> I've had a probably related problem, without using GNOME
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=455
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:51:27PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> I am using Wheezy on a T410 and suspend has never been worse than now
> With squeeze i simply closed the lid and put the notebook away.
> With wheezy its a 1 in 3 chance to suspend. Typically when it
> fails it wont even work the se
> What we need is someone who can reliably reproduce the issue and help
> with debugging.
I've had a probably related problem, without using GNOME
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=455769#59
--
Salvo Tomaselli
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:07:43PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 11:47 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >Would you provide a guarantee to all users of wheezy that you will pay
> >for their laptop repair if this issue causes damage?
>
> > Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/03/13 18:59, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 28.03.2013 18:48, schrieb Daniel Pocock:
>
>> I clearly understand your previous feedback and agree, that is
>> why I thought it might be helpful discussing this issue on
>> debian-devel, to get a feel
On 28/03/13 19:12, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Perfection is unattainable. Every Debian stable release is buggy as
> hell, and that's unavoidable, if we want to make any releases at all.
I don't think anybody raised the issue of perfection
This issue I've observed is a relative one - it was workin
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 06:48:09PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> If a package fails to do what it is supposed to do, isn't that a valid
> argument that it is RC?
>
> gnome-power-manager is meant to suspend a user's laptop when they shut
> the lid and put it in a carry bag. That's what the manual
Am 28.03.2013 18:48, schrieb Daniel Pocock:
> I clearly understand your previous feedback and agree, that is why I
> thought it might be helpful discussing this issue on debian-devel, to
> get a feel for how the community feels about this type of issue and it's
> severity for us and for users
dis
On 28/03/13 16:14, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 06:47 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 28/03/13 11:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> Control: severity -1 important
>>>
>>> I am raising this bug to critical, as it meets the definition "makes
>>> unrelated software on the system (or the whole syst
On 03/28/2013 06:47 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 28/03/13 11:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Control: severity -1 important
>>
>> I am raising this bug to critical, as it meets the definition "makes
>> unrelated software on the system (or the whole system) break"
>> No, it does not. hw will shut its
On 28-03-13 14:04, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 28/03/13 12:32, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On 28-03-13 11:47, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> On 28/03/13 11:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
Control: severity -1 important
I am raising this bug to critical, as it meets the definition "makes
unrelat
On 28/03/13 12:32, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On 28-03-13 11:47, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 28/03/13 11:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> Control: severity -1 important
>>>
>>> I am raising this bug to critical, as it meets the definition "makes
>>> unrelated software on the system (or the whole system)
On 03/28/2013 07:32 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
(on a more personal note, why oh why would you ever want the system to
suspend when you close the lid? That's what a suspend button is for. If my
laptop is compiling something, I do *not* want it to suspend when I close the
lid, thankyouverymuch. Oh
On 28-03-13 11:47, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 28/03/13 11:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Control: severity -1 important
>>
>> I am raising this bug to critical, as it meets the definition "makes
>> unrelated software on the system (or the whole system) break"
>> No, it does not. hw will shut itself o
On 03/28/2013 11:47 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Would you provide a guarantee to all users of wheezy that you will pay
for their laptop repair if this issue causes damage?
> Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent
> permitted by applicable law.
This problem happens regu
On 28/03/13 11:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> I am raising this bug to critical, as it meets the definition "makes
> unrelated software on the system (or the whole system) break"
> No, it does not. hw will shut itself off before getting damaged.
Would you provide a
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:01:10 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> I recently updated a Lenovo X220T to wheezy
>
> I am using the standard wheezy kernel and gnome desktop
>
> $ dpkg --list | grep gnome-power
> ii gnome-power-manager
> 3.4.0-2
I recently updated a Lenovo X220T to wheezy
I am using the standard wheezy kernel and gnome desktop
$ dpkg --list | grep gnome-power
ii gnome-power-manager
3.4.0-2amd64power management tool
for the GNOME desktop
Here are my settings:
$ gs
18 matches
Mail list logo
