On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 13:23:30 +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Julien Cristau writes:
> > changing the source format in a NMU is wrong, don't do that.
>
> Mehdi Dogguy writes:
> > I don't think it's appropriate to switch to source format 3.0 for the
>
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> - Move to
Julien Cristau writes:
> changing the source format in a NMU is wrong, don't do that.
Mehdi Dogguy writes:
> I don't think it's appropriate to switch to source format 3.0 for the
* Non-maintainer upload.
- Move to packaging format "3.0 (quilt)" due to patch.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:49:10AM +0300, jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
>
>Dear maintainer,
>
>Here is the NMU diff according to DevRef 5.11.1[1][2] for bug: #596681.
>See the debian/patches directory for the important fixes.
>
>Please let me know if it is okay to proceed with NMU. Feel free to
>cont
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:49:10 +0300, jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> Here is the NMU diff according to DevRef 5.11.1[1][2] for bug: #596681.
> See the debian/patches directory for the important fixes.
>
> Please let me know if it is okay to proceed with NMU. Feel free to
On 10/15/2010 10:49 AM, jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> Here is the NMU diff according to DevRef 5.11.1[1][2] for bug:
> #596681. See the debian/patches directory for the important fixes.
>
> Please let me know if it is okay to proceed with NMU. Feel free to
> contact if yo
Dear maintainer,
Here is the NMU diff according to DevRef 5.11.1[1][2] for bug: #596681.
See the debian/patches directory for the important fixes.
Please let me know if it is okay to proceed with NMU. Feel free to
contact if you have any questions.
Thank you for maintaining the package,
Jari A
6 matches
Mail list logo