On 25/06/14 00:50, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Should I upload something where xindy is not required?
>>
>> Yes please. That would allow us to finish the libdb5.1 transition by removing
>> clisp and xindy from testing.
>
> How do you want to rem
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Should I upload something where xindy is not required?
>
> Yes please. That would allow us to finish the libdb5.1 transition by removing
> clisp and xindy from testing.
How do you want to remove clisp and xindy from testing?
And, will clisp
On 24/06/14 01:25, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Maybe we can remove clisp and xindy from testing for a moment?
>>>
>>> This will only break the texlive-full and can be easily fixed by
>>> removing xindy
>>> from Depends. Norbert,
Hi everyone,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Maybe we can remove clisp and xindy from testing for a moment?
> >
> > This will only break the texlive-full and can be easily fixed by
> > removing xindy
> > from Depends. Norbert, can you do that for us to finish db5.1 to db5.3
On 05/06/14 14:59, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014, at 19:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: reopen -1
>>
>> On 04/06/14 19:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> This seems to be long done, so I'm closing this bug. Let me know if I missed
>>> something and this should be kept op
> That shouldn't be needed. The bug that was causing clisp to FTBFS on kbsd
> (#740487) was fixed yesterday, and the one preventing clisp from migrating
> (#733445) should be fixed today.
I am away over the weekend and will see what has to be done on Monday.
If there is something left over to do,
On 05/06/14 14:59, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014, at 19:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: reopen -1
>>
>> On 04/06/14 19:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> This seems to be long done, so I'm closing this bug. Let me know if I missed
>>> something and this should be kept op
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014, at 19:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On 04/06/14 19:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > This seems to be long done, so I'm closing this bug. Let me know if I missed
> > something and this should be kept open.
>
> My bad, libdb5.1 is still in test
Control: reopen -1
On 04/06/14 19:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> This seems to be long done, so I'm closing this bug. Let me know if I missed
> something and this should be kept open.
My bad, libdb5.1 is still in testing. Sorry for the noise.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug
9 matches
Mail list logo
