> On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 23:58:10 +0200, Laura Arjona Reina
> said:
> I still have no opinion about this bug, I'll try to put time on getting
> #92 fixed first
Hi Laura,
in #92 you propose excatly what I like to do with the problematic
manuals on /doc/ddp:
"remove them from
CC'in debian-...@lists.debian.org
I still have no opinion about this bug, I'll try to put time on getting
#92 fixed first
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=92
so we can see the bigger picture.
Kind regards,
El 6/4/19 a las 23:35, Thomas Lange escribió:
>
> Package: www
It would be great if someone can check the link to DDP-BR on
/doc/ddp. For me it seems DDP-BR also is outdated. The wiki lists a
Debian release from 2015.
Looking at "Documentos" it see a lot of links not working. Also
several links under those sections reply with "Server not found":
Documentos fe
Package: www.debian.org
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: content
I like to remove very old and outdated content.
Links -> "Debian Linux Installation & Getting Started article in the Linux
Gazette" links to an article from 1997.
The section "Todo List" has two links which point to t
4 matches
Mail list logo