Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped
Hi Richard, On Sat, 2025-07-12 at 14:10 +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 20:28:33 +0100 Richard Lewis > wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2025, 07:43 Andrew Ruthven, wrote: > > > On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 19:48 +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:28:01 +1200 Andrew Ruthven > > > > > > > > > > request-tracker4 has been removed from trixie. Its replacement > > > > > is > > > > > request-tracker5. > > Tried to write this up in > https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/273 - > please check i got this right Yes, this looks good to me. Thank you. -- Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] | Catalyst Cloud: | This space intentionally left blank https://catalystcloud.nz |
Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 20:28:33 +0100 Richard Lewis wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2025, 07:43 Andrew Ruthven, wrote: > > On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 19:48 +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:28:01 +1200 Andrew Ruthven > > > > request-tracker4 has been removed from trixie. Its replacement is > > > > request-tracker5. Tried to write this up in https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/273 - please check i got this right
Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025, 07:43 Andrew Ruthven, wrote: > On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 19:48 +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:28:01 +1200 Andrew Ruthven > > > request-tracker4 and extensions targetting RT4 won't be in trixie. They > > > are > > > replaced by request-tracker5. Can we please include words like the > below > > > in the > > > "Noteworthy obsolete packages" section: > > > > > > request-tracker4 has been removed from trixie. Its replacement is > > > request-tracker5. > > > > Is there a reason that request-tracker4 was not made a transiitional > > package depending on request-tracker5? > > (if the answer is that something is incompatible, we should say what > > and, ideally, link to how to migrate data etc) > > It isn't as simple as making a transitional package. If there are > customisations then they will need to be ported over. Upgrade instructions > are in the request-tracker5 package, and the description notes that it can > be installed simultaneously with request-tracker4. > But we could add > something like "Instructions on how to upgrade are in the request-tracker5 > package, which can be installed simultaneously." cool. i would read "simultaneously" as meaning that people should upgrade to trixie, but keep the release-tracker4 from bookworm installed, install r-t5, do the conversion and then remove r-t4, as opposed to doing the conversion in bookworm
Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped
On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 19:48 +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:28:01 +1200 Andrew Ruthven > wrote: > > > request-tracker4 and extensions targetting RT4 won't be in trixie. They > > are > > replaced by request-tracker5. Can we please include words like the below > > in the > > "Noteworthy obsolete packages" section: > > > > request-tracker4 has been removed from trixie. Its replacement is > > request-tracker5. > > Is there a reason that request-tracker4 was not made a transiitional > package depending on request-tracker5? > (if the answer is that something is incompatible, we should say what > and, ideally, link to how to migrate data etc) It isn't as simple as making a transitional package. If there are customisations then they will need to be ported over. Upgrade instructions are in the request-tracker5 package, and the description notes that it can be installed simultaneously with request-tracker4. I have followed the format used previously in bookworm[0]. But we could add something like "Instructions on how to upgrade are in the request-tracker5 package, which can be installed simultaneously." Cheers, Andrew [0] https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#noteworthy-obsolete-packages -- Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] | Catalyst Cloud: | This space intentionally left blank https://catalystcloud.nz |
Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:28:01 +1200 Andrew Ruthven wrote: > request-tracker4 and extensions targetting RT4 won't be in trixie. They are > replaced by request-tracker5. Can we please include words like the below in > the > "Noteworthy obsolete packages" section: > > request-tracker4 has been removed from trixie. Its replacement is > request-tracker5. Is there a reason that request-tracker4 was not made a transiitional package depending on request-tracker5? (if the answer is that something is incompatible, we should say what and, ideally, link to how to migrate data etc)
Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped
Package: release-notes Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] Hey, request-tracker4 and extensions targetting RT4 won't be in trixie. They are replaced by request-tracker5. Can we please include words like the below in the "Noteworthy obsolete packages" section: request-tracker4 has been removed from trixie. Its replacement is request-tracker5. Cheers, Andrew

