Bug#1121961: src:carl9170fw: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: gcc-sh-elf

[Santiago Vila]

tags 1121961 - unreproducible
thanks

On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 03:49:15PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Control: severity -1 normal
> Control: tags -1 unreproducible
> Control: notfound -1 carl9170fw/1.9.9-686-ge7ba7bf+dfsg-0.1
> 
> gcc-sh-elf has migrated to testing.

So we don't need help to determine the root cause for the package
unbuildability, as it was obvious. Therefore the "unreproducible" tag
does not apply here by definition.

Please don't use the tag if you really mean "it's now fixed"
or "no longer happens".

Thanks.

Bug#1121961: src:carl9170fw: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: gcc-sh-elf

[Bastian Germann]

Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Control: notfound -1 carl9170fw/1.9.9-686-ge7ba7bf+dfsg-0.1

gcc-sh-elf has migrated to testing.

Bug#1121961: src:carl9170fw: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: gcc-sh-elf

[Bastian Germann]

Control: tags -1 pending

Bug#1121961: src:carl9170fw: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: gcc-sh-elf

[Paul Gevers]

Source: carl9170fw
Version: 1.9.9-686-ge7ba7bf+dfsg-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid forky
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable

Dear maintainer(s),

Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed from testing, but unfortunately there are multiple scenarios
where that can happen nevertheless. To uphold our social contract,
Debian requires that packages can be rebuild from source in the suite
we are shipping them, so currently this is a serious issue with your
package in testing.

Can you please investigate the situation and figure out how to resolve
it? Regularly, if the build dependency is available in unstable,
helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to
testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.

Paul

Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.

[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html



OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature