Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
clone 1122336 -1 retitle 1122336 libreoffice: Smoketest fails on powerpc due to non-executable soffice retitle -1 libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa tag -1 - pending thaniks Hi, Am 11.12.25 um 18:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 11.12.25 um 17:53 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: Hello, On Thu, 2025-12-11 at 17:45 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: OK, was wondering whether OpenJDK choked on it. Then the fix would be to either a) $ cat remove-JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE-setting.diff [...] thus triggering the cp or I think it should be safe to drop the complete handling for JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT. There is no JDK by IBM for 32-bit anymore, so all of this has become cruft. [...] b) is cleaner and minimal-invasive. Yes, but we can just drop all of this. I don't think that upstream is interested in keeping this. OK. Now in git: https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/060ebb430ac0f66ea9203be86ed199a2fd2ea75e And submitted upstream: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/195487 For hppa we need another fix (whatever the cause is). Regards, Rene
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Hi, Am 11.12.25 um 17:53 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: Hello, On Thu, 2025-12-11 at 17:45 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: OK, was wondering whether OpenJDK choked on it. Then the fix would be to either a) $ cat remove-JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE-setting.diff [...] thus triggering the cp or I think it should be safe to drop the complete handling for JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT. There is no JDK by IBM for 32-bit anymore, so all of this has become cruft. [...] b) is cleaner and minimal-invasive. Yes, but we can just drop all of this. I don't think that upstream is interested in keeping this. OK. Regards, Rene
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Hi, Am 11.12.25 um 17:45 schrieb Rene Engelhard: OK, was wondering whether OpenJDK choked on it. Then the fix would be to either a) $ cat remove-JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE-setting.diff [...] thus triggering the cp or b) > git diff desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk [...] b) is cleaner and minimal-invasive. a) would cleanly fix it (and we don't care about IBM JDK anyway, do we?) b) would als fix it minimal-invasive but would still have the difference of soffice in the instdir/ tree (in the installed libreoffice-common it's the same everywhere anyway without that setting anyway. so we already don't care about IBMs JDK) Trying b) now on perotto. (hppa has problems with the build-deps so not yet on panama..) Regards, Rene
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Hello, On Thu, 2025-12-11 at 17:45 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > OK, was wondering whether OpenJDK choked on it. Then the fix would be to > either > > a) > > $ cat remove-JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE-setting.diff > diff --git a/config_host.mk.in b/config_host.mk.in > index 3452ad8fde5d..ece7d18116b5 100644 > --- a/config_host.mk.in > +++ b/config_host.mk.in > @@ -390,7 +395,6 @@ export JDK=@JDK@ > export JDK_FOR_BUILD=@JDK_FOR_BUILD@ > export > JDK_SECURITYMANAGER_DISALLOWED_FOR_BUILD=@JDK_SECURITYMANAGER_DISALLOWED_FOR_BUILD@ > export JFREEREPORT_JAR=@JFREEREPORT_JAR@ > -export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE@ > JOM=@JOM@ > export JQ=@JQ@ > export JVM_ONE_PATH_CHECK=@JVM_ONE_PATH_CHECK@ > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index c1baba596656..04d0db7bd7d3 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -9101,14 +9140,6 @@ AC_SUBST(LD_PLUGIN) > AC_CHECK_FUNCS(posix_fallocate, HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE=YES, > [HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE=NO]) > AC_SUBST(HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE) > > -JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE="" > -if test "$_os" = "Linux" -a "$host_cpu" = "powerpc"; then > - # IBMs JDK needs this... > - JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=6 > - export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE > -fi > -AC_SUBST([JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE]) > - git diff desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk > diff --git a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk > index 26e661ec39dc..91c06870725a 100644 > --- a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk > +++ b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ $(gb_CustomTarget_workdir)/desktop/soffice/soffice.sh : \ > $(call gb_Output_announce,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),$(true),SED,1) > $(call gb_Trace_StartRange,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),SED) > ifneq ($(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE),) > - sed -e "s/^#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@/export > JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=$(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE)/" $< > $@ > + sed -e "s/^#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@/export > JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=$(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE)/" $< > $@ && chmod 755 $@ > else > cp $< $@ > endif > > if test $_os = "WINNT"; then > for i in $PKGFORMAT; do > if test "$i" = msi; then > diff --git a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk > index 26e661ec39dc..0c895c77afc0 100644 > --- a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk > +++ b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk > @@ -35,11 +35,7 @@ $(gb_CustomTarget_workdir)/desktop/soffice/soffice.sh : \ > | $(gb_CustomTarget_workdir)/desktop/soffice/.dir > $(call gb_Output_announce,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),$(true),SED,1) > $(call gb_Trace_StartRange,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),SED) > -ifneq ($(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE),) > - sed -e "s/^#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@/export > JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=$(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE)/" $< > $@ > -else > cp $< $@ > -endif > $(call gb_Trace_EndRange,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),SED) > > endif > diff --git a/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh b/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh > index 7188f393e140..1f3c4cd1f0ec 100755 > --- a/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh > +++ b/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh > @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@ export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING > # uncomment line below if you encounter problems starting soffice on your > system > # SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS=true; export SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS > > -#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@ > - > # resolve installation directory > sd_cwd=$(pwd) > sd_res="$0" > > thus triggering the cp or I think it should be safe to drop the complete handling for JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT. There is no JDK by IBM for 32-bit anymore, so all of this has become cruft. > b) > > git diff desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk > diff --git a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk > index 26e661ec39dc..91c06870725a 100644 > --- a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk > +++ b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ $(gb_CustomTarget_workdir)/desktop/soffice/soffice.sh : \ > $(call gb_Output_announce,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),$(true),SED,1) > $(call gb_Trace_StartRange,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),SED) > ifneq ($(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE),) > - sed -e "s/^#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@/export > JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=$(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE)/" $< > $@ > + sed -e "s/^#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@/export > JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=$(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE)/" $< > $@ && chmod 755 $@ > else > cp $< $@ > endif > > > b) is cleaner and minimal-invasive. Yes, but we can just drop all of this. I don't think that upstream is interested in keeping this. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Hi, Am 11.12.25 um 17:35 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: On Thu, 2025-12-11 at 07:15 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: (experimental_powerpc-dchroot)rene@perotto:~/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1$ diff -u instdir/program/soffice.old instdir/program/soffice --- instdir/program/soffice.old 2025-12-11 01:55:33.611241288 + +++ instdir/program/soffice 2025-12-11 06:08:10.728584683 + @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ # uncomment line below if you encounter problems starting soffice on your system # SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS=true; export SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS -export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=6 +#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@ # resolve installation directory sd_cwd=$(pwd) which is powerpc-specific, indeed. From configure.ac: JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE="" if test "$_os" = "Linux" -a "$host_cpu" = "powerpc"; then # IBMs JDK needs this... JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=6 export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE fi AC_SUBST([JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE]) So it means hppa is something different. Whether it sets "export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=6" or not in the script shouldn't make any difference unless I'm missing something. This just seems to be an environment variable that is required when using a JDK provided by IBM but should be safe to ignore otherwise. OK, was wondering whether OpenJDK choked on it. Then the fix would be to either a) $ cat remove-JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE-setting.diff diff --git a/config_host.mk.in b/config_host.mk.in index 3452ad8fde5d..ece7d18116b5 100644 --- a/config_host.mk.in +++ b/config_host.mk.in @@ -390,7 +395,6 @@ export JDK=@JDK@ export JDK_FOR_BUILD=@JDK_FOR_BUILD@ export JDK_SECURITYMANAGER_DISALLOWED_FOR_BUILD=@JDK_SECURITYMANAGER_DISALLOWED_FOR_BUILD@ export JFREEREPORT_JAR=@JFREEREPORT_JAR@ -export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE@ JOM=@JOM@ export JQ=@JQ@ export JVM_ONE_PATH_CHECK=@JVM_ONE_PATH_CHECK@ diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index c1baba596656..04d0db7bd7d3 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -9101,14 +9140,6 @@ AC_SUBST(LD_PLUGIN) AC_CHECK_FUNCS(posix_fallocate, HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE=YES, [HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE=NO]) AC_SUBST(HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE) -JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE="" -if test "$_os" = "Linux" -a "$host_cpu" = "powerpc"; then - # IBMs JDK needs this... - JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=6 - export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE -fi -AC_SUBST([JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE]) - git diff desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk diff --git a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk index 26e661ec39dc..91c06870725a 100644 --- a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk +++ b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ $(gb_CustomTarget_workdir)/desktop/soffice/soffice.sh : \ $(call gb_Output_announce,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),$(true),SED,1) $(call gb_Trace_StartRange,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),SED) ifneq ($(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE),) - sed -e "s/^#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@/export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=$(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE)/" $< > $@ + sed -e "s/^#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@/export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=$(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE)/" $< > $@ && chmod 755 $@ else cp $< $@ endif if test $_os = "WINNT"; then for i in $PKGFORMAT; do if test "$i" = msi; then diff --git a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk index 26e661ec39dc..0c895c77afc0 100644 --- a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk +++ b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk @@ -35,11 +35,7 @@ $(gb_CustomTarget_workdir)/desktop/soffice/soffice.sh : \ | $(gb_CustomTarget_workdir)/desktop/soffice/.dir $(call gb_Output_announce,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),$(true),SED,1) $(call gb_Trace_StartRange,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),SED) -ifneq ($(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE),) - sed -e "s/^#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@/export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=$(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE)/" $< > $@ -else cp $< $@ -endif $(call gb_Trace_EndRange,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),SED) endif diff --git a/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh b/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh index 7188f393e140..1f3c4cd1f0ec 100755 --- a/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh +++ b/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@ export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING # uncomment line below if you encounter problems starting soffice on your system # SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS=true; export SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS -#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@ - # resolve installation directory sd_cwd=$(pwd) sd_res="$0" thus triggering the cp or b) git diff desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk diff --git a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk index 26e661ec39dc..91c06870725a 100644 --- a/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk +++ b/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ $(gb_CustomTarget_workdir)/desktop/soffice/soffice.sh : \ $(call gb_Output_announce,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),$(true),SED,1) $(call gb_Trace_StartRange,$(subst $(WORKDIR)/,,$@),SED) ifneq ($(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE),) - sed -e "s/^#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@/export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=$(JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE)/" $< > $@ + sed -e "s/^#@JITC_PROC
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Am 11.12.25 um 17:21 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 11.12.25 um 17:03 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: On Wed, 2025-12-10 at 08:40 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Thus, we need to figure out why the build doesn't actually generated the wrapper script for hppa, powerpc (and probably m68k) in order to fix the smokeest on these targets. So, it turns out that the wrapper script wasn't copied But the file is there as perotto shows. But not +x probably, didn't check that. Which the cp fixes. See my last reply to that. That should fix powerpc. The question is what happens with m68k and hppa. (Note --disable-gui doesn't affect that magic "X11" conditional either, even if your patch were correctly around and m68k and hppa and powerpc needed to be removed from it, especially since the checks are ran against a "normal" build) Regards, Rene
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Hello, On Thu, 2025-12-11 at 07:15 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > (experimental_powerpc-dchroot)rene@perotto:~/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1$ diff > -u instdir/program/soffice.old instdir/program/soffice > --- instdir/program/soffice.old 2025-12-11 01:55:33.611241288 + > +++ instdir/program/soffice 2025-12-11 06:08:10.728584683 + > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ > # uncomment line below if you encounter problems starting soffice on your > system > # SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS=true; export SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS > > -export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=6 > +#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@ > > # resolve installation directory > sd_cwd=$(pwd) > > which is powerpc-specific, indeed. From configure.ac: > > JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE="" > if test "$_os" = "Linux" -a "$host_cpu" = "powerpc"; then > # IBMs JDK needs this... > JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=6 > export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE > fi > AC_SUBST([JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE]) > > So it means hppa is something different. Whether it sets "export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=6" or not in the script shouldn't make any difference unless I'm missing something. This just seems to be an environment variable that is required when using a JDK provided by IBM but should be safe to ignore otherwise. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Hi, Am 11.12.25 um 17:21 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Running chmod 755 instdir/program/soffice manually allows the smoketest to pass. Which would also be solved by removing the JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE thingy and relying on cp which would copy the +x instead of relying on sed which dosn't create it +x. see https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/refs/heads/master/desktop/CustomTarget_soffice.mk#38 Regards, Rene
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Hi, Am 11.12.25 um 17:03 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: On Wed, 2025-12-10 at 08:40 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Thus, we need to figure out why the build doesn't actually generated the wrapper script for hppa, powerpc (and probably m68k) in order to fix the smokeest on these targets. So, it turns out that the wrapper script wasn't copied But the file is there as perotto shows. See my last reply. because hppa, m68k and powerpc are listed in OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS which the following patch fixes: Your "patch" adds them where you say it was listed before. $(filter is not $(filter-out here. This setting also is supposed to control whether LO is built twice, one time with --disable-gui (*-nogui packages) and one time with GUI. Don't think you want that on those archs. --- debian/rules.orig 2025-12-11 15:56:17.424880233 + +++ debian/rules2025-12-10 11:19:19.696634221 + @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_REPORTBUILDER_ARCHS)) OOO_FIREBIRD_ARCHS := $(filter-out m68k,$(OOO_BASE_ARCHS)) $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_FIREBIRD_ARCHS)) -OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS := $(filter amd64 i386 arm64 armhf s390x ppc64 ppc64el,$(OOO_ARCHS)) +OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS := $(filter alpha amd64 i386 arm64 armhf s390x hppa m68k powerpc ppc64 ppc64el sparc64,$(OOO_ARCHS)) $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS)) OOO_PDFIUM_ARCHS := $(OOO_ARCHS) $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_PDFIUM_ARCHS)) See above. This would result in [1]. Not what you want. and the other archs etc just running the basic tests are not there either. While this change makes sure the script is generated, the script itself still missing the executable flag meaning that the smoketest will still fail. Running chmod 755 instdir/program/soffice manually allows the smoketest to pass. Which would also be solved by removing the JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE thingy and relying on cp which would copy the +x instead of relying on sed which dosn't create it +x. Regards, Rene [1] index ef8c2b4e0..b222415db 100644 --- a/control +++ b/control @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ Standards-Version: 4.0.1 Rules-Requires-Root: no Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice.git -b debian-experimental-26.2 Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice -Bugs: +Bugs: mailto:[email protected] Homepage: http://www.libreoffice.org Package: libreoffice @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ Description: office productivity suite (metapackage) * afdko-bin: Handling of embedded fonts during import/export/... Package: libreoffice-nogui -Architecture: amd64 arm64 armhf i386 ppc64 ppc64el s390x +Architecture: alpha amd64 arm64 armhf hppa i386 m68k powerpc ppc64 ppc64el s390x sparc64 Section: metapackages Depends: libreoffice-base-nogui, libreoffice-calc-nogui, @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ Description: office productivity suite -- arch-dependent files LibreOffice. See the libreoffice package for more information. Package: libreoffice-core-nogui -Architecture: amd64 arm64 armhf i386 ppc64 ppc64el s390x +Architecture: alpha amd64 arm64 armhf hppa i386 m68k powerpc ppc64 ppc64el s390x sparc64 Built-Using: ${cargo:Built-Using} Static-Built-Using: ${cargo:Static-Built-Using} Depends: fontconfig, @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ Description: office productivity suite -- word processor This package contains the wordprocessor component for LibreOffice. Package: libreoffice-writer-nogui -Architecture: amd64 arm64 armhf i386 ppc64 ppc64el s390x +Architecture: alpha amd64 arm64 armhf hppa i386 m68k powerpc ppc64 ppc64el s390x sparc64 Depends: libreoffice-base-core (= ${binary:Version}), libreoffice-common (>= 1:7.0.0~alpha~), libreoffice-core-nogui (= ${binary:Version}) | libreoffice-core (= ${binary:Version}), @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ Description: office productivity suite -- spreadsheet This package contains the spreadsheet component for LibreOffice. Package: libreoffice-calc-nogui -Architecture: amd64 arm64 armhf i386 ppc64 ppc64el s390x +Architecture: alpha amd64 arm64 armhf hppa i386 m68k powerpc ppc64 ppc64el s390x sparc64 Depends: libreoffice-base-core (= ${binary:Version}), libreoffice-common (>= 1:7.0.0~alpha~), libreoffice-core-nogui (= ${binary:Version}) | libreoffice-core (= ${binary:Version}), @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ Description: office productivity suite -- presentation This package contains the presentation component for LibreOffice. Package: libreoffice-impress-nogui -Architecture: amd64 arm64 armhf i386 ppc64 ppc64el s390x +Architecture: alpha amd64 arm64 armhf hppa i386 m68k powerpc ppc64 ppc64el s390x sparc64 Depends: libreoffice-common (>= 1:7.0.0~alpha~), libreoffice-core-nogui (= ${binary:Version}) | libreoffice-core (= ${binary:Version}), libreoffice-draw-nogui (= ${binary:Version}) | libreoffice-draw (= ${binary:Version}), @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ Description: office productivity suite
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
On Wed, 2025-12-10 at 08:40 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Thus, we need to figure out why the build doesn't actually generated the > wrapper script > for hppa, powerpc (and probably m68k) in order to fix the smokeest on these > targets. So, it turns out that the wrapper script wasn't copied because hppa, m68k and powerpc are listed in OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS which the following patch fixes: --- debian/rules.orig 2025-12-11 15:56:17.424880233 + +++ debian/rules2025-12-10 11:19:19.696634221 + @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_REPORTBUILDER_ARCHS)) OOO_FIREBIRD_ARCHS := $(filter-out m68k,$(OOO_BASE_ARCHS)) $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_FIREBIRD_ARCHS)) -OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS := $(filter amd64 i386 arm64 armhf s390x ppc64 ppc64el,$(OOO_ARCHS)) +OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS := $(filter alpha amd64 i386 arm64 armhf s390x hppa m68k powerpc ppc64 ppc64el sparc64,$(OOO_ARCHS)) $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS)) OOO_PDFIUM_ARCHS := $(OOO_ARCHS) $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_PDFIUM_ARCHS)) While this change makes sure the script is generated, the script itself still missing the executable flag meaning that the smoketest will still fail. Running chmod 755 instdir/program/soffice manually allows the smoketest to pass. So, while this is fixed halfway, more investigation is necessary. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 --- debian/rules.orig 2025-12-11 15:56:17.424880233 + +++ debian/rules 2025-12-10 11:19:19.696634221 + @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_REPORTBUILDER_ARCHS)) OOO_FIREBIRD_ARCHS := $(filter-out m68k,$(OOO_BASE_ARCHS)) $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_FIREBIRD_ARCHS)) -OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS := $(filter amd64 i386 arm64 armhf s390x ppc64 ppc64el,$(OOO_ARCHS)) +OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS := $(filter alpha amd64 i386 arm64 armhf s390x hppa m68k powerpc ppc64 ppc64el sparc64,$(OOO_ARCHS)) $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS)) OOO_PDFIUM_ARCHS := $(OOO_ARCHS) $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_PDFIUM_ARCHS))
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
retitle 1122336 libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc thanks Hi, Am 11.12.25 um 02:53 schrieb Rene Engelhard: But indeed, that works, interesting. rebuilt again (you shouldn't use parallel=1...), after it fails I tried this: mv instdir/program/soffice instdir/program/soffice.old cp desktop/scripts/soffice.sh instdir/program/soffice diff -u instdir/program/soffice.old instdir/program/soffice This results in (experimental_powerpc-dchroot)rene@perotto:~/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1$ diff -u instdir/program/soffice.old instdir/program/soffice --- instdir/program/soffice.old 2025-12-11 01:55:33.611241288 + +++ instdir/program/soffice 2025-12-11 06:08:10.728584683 + @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ # uncomment line below if you encounter problems starting soffice on your system # SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS=true; export SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS -export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=6 +#@JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE_EXPORT@ # resolve installation directory sd_cwd=$(pwd) which is powerpc-specific, indeed. From configure.ac: JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE="" if test "$_os" = "Linux" -a "$host_cpu" = "powerpc"; then # IBMs JDK needs this... JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=6 export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE fi AC_SUBST([JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE]) So it means hppa is something different. Regards, Rene
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Hi, Am 10.12.25 um 08:40 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: on hppa and powerpc, the libreoffice package fails due to a failing smoketest [1]: [_RUN_] (anonymous namespace)::Test::test ./unotest/source/cpp/officeconnection.cxx:77:(anonymous namespace)::Test::test setUp() failed - equality assertion failed - Expected: 0 - Actual : 4 (anonymous namespace)::Test::test finished in: 6ms officeconnection.cxx:77:Assertion Test name: (anonymous namespace)::Test::test setUp() failed - equality assertion failed - Expected: 0 - Actual : 4 Failures !!! Run: 1 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors: 0 That's powerpc, yes. After some investigation and discussions with upstream [2], I figured out that the problem is the missing wrapper script instdir/program/soffice for the soffice.bin binary. This script is normally generated from "desktop/scripts/soffice.sh via makefile targets in desktop/ CustomTarget_sofice.mk and desktop/Package_soffice_sh.mk" (quoting Stephan Bergmann from [3]). (experimental_powerpc-dchroot)rene@perotto:~/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1$ find instdir/ -name "soffice*" instdir/sdk/examples/DevelopersGuide/ScriptingFramework/ScriptSelector/ScriptSelector/soffice.gif instdir/program/soffice instdir/program/sofficerc instdir/program/soffice.bin instdir/share/config/soffice.cfg (experimental_powerpc-dchroot)rene@perotto:~/libreoffi Source: libreoffice Version: 4:26.2.0~beta1-1 Severity: normal User: [email protected] Usertags: m68k,hppa,powerpc X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected],[email protected],[email protected] Hello, ce-26.2.0~beta1$ head -n 1 instdir/program/soffice #!/bin/sh (experimental_powerpc-dchroot)rene@perotto:~/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1$ I therefore copied the script manually and rerun the smoketest which immediately succeeded: glaubitz@perotto:~/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1$ cp -av desktop/scripts/soffice.sh instdir/program/soffice 'desktop/scripts/soffice.sh' -> 'instdir/program/soffice' glaubitz@perotto:~/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1$ (sid_powerpc-dchroot)glaubitz@perotto:~/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/smoketest$ make subsequentcheck V=1 rm -rf /home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/workdir/CustomTarget/smoketest mkdir -p /home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/workdir/CustomTarget/smoketest/user cp /home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/qadevOOo/qa/registrymodifications.xcu /home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/workdir/CustomTarget/smoketest/user [CUT] smoketest S=/home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1 && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir && mkdir -p $W/CppunitTest/ && rm -fr $W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.user && cp -r $W/unittest $W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.user &&rm -fr $W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.core && mkdir $W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.core && cd $W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.core && ( MAX_CONCURRENCY=4 MOZILLA_CERTIFICATE_FOLDER=dbm: SAL_DISABLE_SYNCHRONOUS_PRINTER_DETECTION=1 SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=svp LIBO_LANG=C LO_RUNNING_UNIT_TEST=1 env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}"$I/program:$I/program":$W/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/.libs$W/LinkTarget/Executable/cppunittester $W/LinkTarget/CppunitTest/libtest_smoketest.so --headless "-env:BRAND_BASE_DIR=file://$S/instdir" "-env:BRAND_SHARE_SUBDIR=share" "-env:BRAND_SHARE_RESOURCE_SUBDIR=program/resource" "-env:UserInstallation=file://$W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.user" "-env:UNO_TYPES=file://$I/program/types.rdb file://$I/program/types/offapi.rdb" "-env:UNO_SERVICES=file://$W/Rdb/ure/services.rdb" -env:URE_BIN_DIR=file://$I/program -env:URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR=file://$I/program -env:LO_LIB_DIR=file://$I/program -env:LO_JAVA_DIR=file://$I/program/classes --protector $W/LinkTarget/Library/unoexceptionprotector.so unoexceptionprotector --protector $W/LinkTarget/Library/unobootstrapprotector.so unobootstrapprotector -env:arg-soffice=path:$I/program/soffice -env:arg-user=$W/CustomTarget/smoketest -env:arg-env=LD_LIBRARY_PATH"${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH}" -env:arg-testarg.smoketest.doc=$W/Zip/smoketestdoc.sxw "-env:CPPUNITTESTTARGET=$W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test" ) 2>&1 [_RUN_] (anonymous namespace)::Test::test (anonymous namespace)::Test::test finished in: 13398ms OK (1) [SCK] smoketest S=/home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1 && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir && mkdir -p $W/Module/subsequentcheck/ && touch $W/Module/subsequentcheck/smoketest (sid_powerpc-dchroot)glaubitz@perotto:~/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/smoketest$ But indeed, that works, interesting. Regards, Rene
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Source: libreoffice Version: 4:26.2.0~beta1-1 Severity: normal User: [email protected] Usertags: m68k,hppa,powerpc X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected],[email protected],[email protected] Hello, on hppa and powerpc, the libreoffice package fails due to a failing smoketest [1]: [_RUN_] (anonymous namespace)::Test::test ./unotest/source/cpp/officeconnection.cxx:77:(anonymous namespace)::Test::test setUp() failed - equality assertion failed - Expected: 0 - Actual : 4 (anonymous namespace)::Test::test finished in: 6ms officeconnection.cxx:77:Assertion Test name: (anonymous namespace)::Test::test setUp() failed - equality assertion failed - Expected: 0 - Actual : 4 Failures !!! Run: 1 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors: 0 After some investigation and discussions with upstream [2], I figured out that the problem is the missing wrapper script instdir/program/soffice for the soffice.bin binary. This script is normally generated from "desktop/scripts/soffice.sh via makefile targets in desktop/ CustomTarget_sofice.mk and desktop/Package_soffice_sh.mk" (quoting Stephan Bergmann from [3]). I therefore copied the script manually and rerun the smoketest which immediately succeeded: glaubitz@perotto:~/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1$ cp -av desktop/scripts/soffice.sh instdir/program/soffice 'desktop/scripts/soffice.sh' -> 'instdir/program/soffice' glaubitz@perotto:~/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1$ (sid_powerpc-dchroot)glaubitz@perotto:~/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/smoketest$ make subsequentcheck V=1 rm -rf /home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/workdir/CustomTarget/smoketest mkdir -p /home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/workdir/CustomTarget/smoketest/user cp /home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/qadevOOo/qa/registrymodifications.xcu /home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/workdir/CustomTarget/smoketest/user [CUT] smoketest S=/home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1 && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir && mkdir -p $W/CppunitTest/ && rm -fr $W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.user && cp -r $W/unittest $W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.user &&rm -fr $W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.core && mkdir $W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.core && cd $W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.core && ( MAX_CONCURRENCY=4 MOZILLA_CERTIFICATE_FOLDER=dbm: SAL_DISABLE_SYNCHRONOUS_PRINTER_DETECTION=1 SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=svp LIBO_LANG=C LO_RUNNING_UNIT_TEST=1 env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}"$I/program:$I/program":$W/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/.libs $W/LinkTarget/Executable/cppunittester $W/LinkTarget/CppunitTest/libtest_smoketest.so --headless "-env:BRAND_BASE_DIR=file://$S/instdir" "-env:BRAND_SHARE_SUBDIR=share" "-env:BRAND_SHARE_RESOURCE_SUBDIR=program/resource" "-env:UserInstallation=file://$W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test.user" "-env:UNO_TYPES=file://$I/program/types.rdb file://$I/program/types/offapi.rdb" "-env:UNO_SERVICES=file://$W/Rdb/ure/services.rdb" -env:URE_BIN_DIR=file://$I/program -env:URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR=file://$I/program -env:LO_LIB_DIR=file://$I/program -env:LO_JAVA_DIR=file://$I/program/classes --protector $W/LinkTarget/Library/unoexceptionprotector.so unoexceptionprotector --protector $W/LinkTarget/Library/unobootstrapprotector.so unobootstrapprotector -env:arg-soffice=path:$I/program/soffice -env:arg-user=$W/CustomTarget/smoketest -env:arg-env=LD_LIBRARY_PATH"${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH}" -env:arg-testarg.smoketest.doc=$W/Zip/smoketestdoc.sxw "-env:CPPUNITTESTTARGET=$W/CppunitTest/smoketest.test" ) 2>&1 [_RUN_] (anonymous namespace)::Test::test (anonymous namespace)::Test::test finished in: 13398ms OK (1) [SCK] smoketest S=/home/glaubitz/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1 && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir && mkdir -p $W/Module/subsequentcheck/ && touch $W/Module/subsequentcheck/smoketest (sid_powerpc-dchroot)glaubitz@perotto:~/loffice/libreoffice-26.2.0~beta1/smoketest$ Thus, we need to figure out why the build doesn't actually generated the wrapper script for hppa, powerpc (and probably m68k) in order to fix the smokeest on these targets. Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=powerpc&ver=4%3A26.2.0%7Ebeta1-1&stamp=1765108295&raw=0 > [2] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2025-December/094089.html > [3] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2025-December/094090.html -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
