Bug#694308: non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge

2015-12-27 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, >The originals of several of these functions seem to appear (with >non-DFSG-free licensing) in the appendices of >http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/font/5015.Type1_Supp.pdf > >In particular, the licensing says: > This code, as well as the code in the following appendices, is c

Bug#809194: ITP: golang-github-docopt-docopt-go -- An implementation of docopt in the Go programming language.

2015-12-27 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: gustavo panizzo * Package name: golang-github-docopt-docopt-go Version : 0.6.1 Upstream Author : Keith Batten * URL : http://docopt.org * License : MIT/X Programming Lang: Go Description : An implementation of doc

Bug#809191: ITP: golang-github-creack-termios -- Multi Platform Golang terminal management: Raw mode, TTY size.

2015-12-27 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: gustavo panizzo * Package name: golang-github-creack-termios Version : 0.0_git20140919 Upstream Author : Guillaume J. Charmes * URL : https://github.com/creack/termios * License : MIT/X Programming Lang: Go Descripti

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

2015-12-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Alberto Salvia Novella writes: > The problem seems to be that the package manager does not make its basic > functionality, which is to make clear for users which packages they wish > to remove. > For me it seems a minor problem that a console tool could be removed, > compared with packages accum

Bug#809157: ITP: rakudo-star -- Perl 6 core modules

2015-12-27 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: wnpp Owner: Dominique Dumont Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pkg-rakudo-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: rakudo-star Version : 2015.11 Upstream Author : the Rakudo Star Team * URL : http://rakudo.org/ * License

outdated/ packaging style -- all packages (my)

2015-12-27 Thread hpfn
Hi, All packages I maintain are on the list. Including de the QA. https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=h...@ig.com.br - package: btcheck version: 1.9-2 format: 3.0 (quilt) patch: - 3.0 (quilt) homepage: true pkghelper: - debhelper - dh vcs: - git maintainer-is-list: fa

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

2015-12-27 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
David Kalnischkies: > Your complain was after all that apt declares some packages you > consider unused as used... The problem seems to be that the package manager does not make its basic functionality, which is to make clear for users which packages they wish to remove. For me it seems a min

Re: Bug#809014: ITP: chewing-editor -- libchewing user phrase editor

2015-12-27 Thread The Wanderer
On 2015-12-27 at 00:38, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: > On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 09:24:08AM +, Wookey wrote: > >> I am none the wiser what this software does as I don't know what a >> 'chewing user phrase' is. I think this description should be expanded a >> little so it makes sense to a general

Re: Bug#809014: ITP: chewing-editor -- libchewing user phrase editor

2015-12-27 Thread Jakub Wilk
* ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) , 2015-12-27, 13:38: chewing-editor is a cross platform user dictionary edtiro for chewing Typo: edtiro -> editor -- Jakub Wilk