The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 741 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 174 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
Hello Everyone,
Sorry to interject in this matter however it is beginning to become
repetitive. PGP Key Signing for New Members is purely an identification
process, to prove that you are who you say you are. This provides the
Debian Foundation with the assurance that you can be trusted monitor
Quoting Michael Lustfield (2016-06-23 21:27:15)
> Somewhere, I saw it mentioned that you should be able to verify based
> on history only and their legal name doesn't matter. I don't entirely
> disagree. The chances of the NSA building a super computer to
> contribute to Debian, become a DD, and
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:52:35PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Jun 23 2016, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:23:07AM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> >> As I said in my other email, I am wondering if the extra burden is worth
> >> the gain in security.
> >
> > Is there an ext
Quoting Peter Colberg (2016-06-23 20:39:52)
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:30:42PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> As as data point, if everybody[0]'s key signing policy had been that
>> establishing "social bonds" was a prerequisite, I would have almost
>> certainly never become a DD.
>
> I would like
On Jun 23 2016, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:23:07AM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> As I said in my other email, I am wondering if the extra burden is worth
>> the gain in security.
>
> Is there an extra burden? Seems to me that it'd happen naturally if
> you contribute to De
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:23:07AM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > As I said in my other email, I am wondering if the extra burden is worth
> > the gain in security.
>
> Is there an extra burden? Seems to me that it'd happen naturally if
>
Hi all,
I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for
Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at [1].
I've packaged neomutt for Debian. A Debian ITP [2] is filed. The
binaries are build in a sid environment. The sources are fetched
from [3]. The neomutt branch is used.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:39:52PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> The union of the DDs I have worked with and the DDs that were kind
> enough to meet with me for key signing on their travel through my
> city is an empty set.
How embarrassing: I meant the intersection, of course.
Peter
signature.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:30:42PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> As as data point, if everybody[0]'s key signing policy had been that
> establishing "social bonds" was a prerequisite, I would have almost
> certainly never become a DD.
I would like to add another data point as a recent DM. The union o
* Nikolaus Rath , 2016-06-23, 09:23:
I am wondering if the extra burden is worth the gain in security. If
everyone were to follow this procedure then the bar to becoming a
Debian developer would be raised significantly.
As as data point, if everybody[0]'s key signing policy had been that
esta
Quoting Lars Wirzenius (2016-05-26 08:08:35)
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:09:47PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> By also considering the fact that the "-d DIR" solution does not
>> prevent to add a "-l" in the future, I think minimality wins here
>> (hence my "Yay" to your proposal in separa
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:23:07AM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> As I said in my other email, I am wondering if the extra burden is worth
> the gain in security.
Is there an extra burden? Seems to me that it'd happen naturally if
you contribute to Debian and as part of that interact with other
Deb
On Jun 23 2016, Ben Finney wrote:
> Nikolaus Rath writes:
>
>> But how is your policy preventing this?
>
> If you're looking for claims of “This policy will absolutely guarantee
> the malicious behaviour is impossible”, of course that's not a
> believable claim and I don't expect anyone to seriou
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: phipack
Version : 0.0.20160614
Upstream Author : David Bryant
* URL :
http://www.maths.otago.ac.nz/~dbryant/software/PhiPack.tar.gz
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kartik Mistry
* Package name: apertium-eu-en
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : 2008, Prompsit Language Engineering
2005-2008, Universitat d'Alacant (Transducens group)
2005-2007, IXA research group / I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: libfastahack
Version : 0.0+20160309
Upstream Author : Erik Garrison
* URL : https://github.com/ekg/fastahack
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : library for indexing
On Jun 22, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Given that snapd therefore seems to be, in practice, only usable by
> Canonical's server, shouldn't the package be in contrib instead of
> main?
No: this was discussed the first time ~15 years ago IIRC for ICQ
clients, and I do not think that anything has chang
18 matches
Mail list logo
