On Thu, 01 Apr 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Upstream is aware of the problem,
> http://python.org/dev/peps/pep-0382/, but still lacks an
> implementation.
Apparently (thanks to a reminder from Josselin) it seems I am fine
shipping NO scikits/__init__.py at all ;) pysupport would take care
about
Thank you Matthias!
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This is a simple, robust way of packaging this file. You don't need
> to package this as a separate source, usually it can be built as a
> separate binary from some source which is common to all of these
> packages (as e.g. done in z
On 31.03.2010 18:18, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Dear Debianizers,
NB. I have asked similar question at debian-python [1] but had no
replies, so re-posting to -devel now
I am ITPing python-scikits-learn and possibly few other python-scikits-*
packages in the future. All of the packages woul
Dear Debianizers,
NB. I have asked similar question at debian-python [1] but had no
replies, so re-posting to -devel now
I am ITPing python-scikits-learn and possibly few other python-scikits-*
packages in the future. All of the packages would have 1 peculiarity,
they all would rely on havin
4 matches
Mail list logo