Re: Extended descriptions size (was Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions)

2009-03-21 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Michael Bramer wrote: if we like to remove the long description from the package file, we must change apt in some way and use some other rules for select the right description (a new 'Description-md5sum' or the Version-Nr) I'd call the Version-Nr. a sinsible choice. ;-)

Re: Re: Extended descriptions size (was Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions)

2009-03-21 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Neil Williams wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:15:00 -0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote: [...] > > What about a way of having a really long, detailed, nicely formatted > > description on packages.debian.org but a much shorter, more basic > > version in the Packages.gz file? > > > The extended descri

Re: Extended descriptions size (was Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions)

2009-03-21 Thread Michael Bramer
Paul Wise schrieb: On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Neil Williams wrote: It's another instance of duplication - why retain the long description in the Packages file while a translated version also exists from DDTP? Probably better for the description to be removed from the Packages file comp

Re: Extended descriptions size (was Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions)

2009-03-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Neil Williams wrote: > It's another instance of duplication - why retain the long description > in the Packages file while a translated version also exists from DDTP? > Probably better for the description to be removed from the Packages > file completely and the D

Re: Extended descriptions size (was Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions)

2009-03-21 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:28:36 +0900 Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > > The extended description needs to be available to APT, not only via > > packages.d.o. > > I agree with Neil William's comment in the other thread about removing > long descripti

Re: Extended descriptions size (was Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions)

2009-03-21 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:15:00 -0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:45:09 +0100 (CET) > > Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > I tried to find a clear advise how to reasonable format lists inside long > > > descriptions of packages. The only thing I know is that lines with two > > >

Re: Extended descriptions size (was Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions)

2009-03-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > The extended description needs to be available to APT, not only via > packages.d.o. I agree with Neil William's comment in the other thread about removing long descriptions from the Packages files. I think the obvious place to put them i