Re: Installed gcc272 2.7.2.3-18 (i386 all source)

2001-04-01 Thread Matthias Klose
Richard A Nelson writes: > Hrm, gcc272 is still the preferred compiler for 2.2.x series, is it not? It is, for i386 (and probably for m68k). > It is automagically used by the kernel build script: > > Linux version 2.2.19pre18 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.7.2.3) #7 Fri > Mar 23 11:44:

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gcc272 2.7.2.3-18

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 12375 + fixed Bug#12375: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: -O2 produces bad code ! Tags added: fixed > tag 20606 + fixed Bug#20606: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: register variable corruption Tags added: fixed > tag 20889 + fixed Bug#20889: [Fixed

gcc272_2.7.2.3-18_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: gcc272_2.7.2.3-18_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc272/gcc272_2.7.2.3-18_i386.deb gcc272_2.7.2.3-18.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc272/gcc272_2.7.2.3-18.dsc gcc272_2.7.2.3-18.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc272/gcc272_2.7.2.3-18.diff.gz gcc272-docs_2.7.2.3-18_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc272/gcc272-do

Fixed in NMU of gcc272 2.7.2.3-18

2001-04-01 Thread Debian GCC maintainers
tag 12375 + fixed tag 20606 + fixed tag 20889 + fixed tag 24788 + fixed tag 26100 + fixed tag 34322 + fixed tag 4429 + fixed tag 4430 + fixed tag 48726 + fixed tag 5367 + fixed tag 54544 + fixed tag 6047 + fixed tag 63154 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-

gcc272 override disparity

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): gcc272_2.7.2.3-18_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra. gcc272-docs_2.7.2.3-18_all.deb: section is overridden from doc to devel. gcc272-docs_2.7.2.3-18_all.deb: priority

Bug#92153: marked as done (gcc-2.95: fails to build)

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:15:50 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 2.95.3-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#92022: marked as done (Change to Suggests)

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.3-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#90390: marked as done (gcc-2.95: builds binary-indep packages in binary-arch target)

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.3-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#90355: marked as done (Upstream changelog missing)

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:12:17 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#90355: Upstream changelog missing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i