Bug#95358: gpc-2.95 error in prerm

2001-04-26 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Hi, sorry I made a mistake in my original report because I found another bug while writing the report. The missing -r option is in /var/lib/dpkg/info/gpc-2.95.preinst : # dpkg cannot handle transistions from symlinks to directories rm -f /usr/share/doc/gpc-2.95 || true The prerm script still l

Bug#95358: gpc-2.95 error in prerm

2001-04-26 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Package: gpc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.4-0.010424 Severity: normal Hi, here is the error : # apt-get install --reinstall gpc-2.95 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 8 not upgraded. 2 packages not full

Re: 3.0 and warning!?

2001-04-26 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:03:32PM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote: > > I think both my woody and sid machines got it. > Ah, so it didn't just install it, you had it installed already, and it got upgraded. FYI, gcc-3.0 is not used by default. Calling "gcc" or "cc" will use gcc-2.95. You need to set CC=

Re: 3.0 and warning!?

2001-04-26 Thread Ketil Malde
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 26 16:22:56 2001 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:08:14 -0400 From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3.0 and warning!? References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcc´Ô ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä?

2001-04-26 Thread ¿Â¶óÀÎÄÚ¸®¾Æ
¢Ä ¿À´ÃÀÇ À¯¸Ó ¢Å ¡á°ú½Ã¿åA girl got an engagement ring, and would seize every opportunity for calling attention to it.  In a group with girl friends no one noticed it.  Finally when herfriends were sitting around talking, she got up suddenly and said, "It's awfully hot in here. I th

Re: 3.0 and warning!?

2001-04-26 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:13:50AM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote: > > Hi > > Just did the usual Update/Upgrade thing, and suddenly dselect wants to > upgrade my gcc to 3.0. Later on, I get this horrendous warning about > it. > > I mean, all right, development snapshot and all, but surely dselect >

Bug#95318: gcc-3.0: unnecessary cwtl

2001-04-26 Thread herbert
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-0pre010403 Severity: minor gcc-3.0 wastes a byte in the following code on i386: a: pushl %ebp movl%esp, %ebp movl8(%ebp), %eax andl$1, %eax cwtl popl%ebp ret The cwtl is unnecessary since %e

3.0 and warning!?

2001-04-26 Thread Ketil Malde
Hi Just did the usual Update/Upgrade thing, and suddenly dselect wants to upgrade my gcc to 3.0. Later on, I get this horrendous warning about it. I mean, all right, development snapshot and all, but surely dselect shouldn't *automatically* upgrade if it is this dangerous?! (Using woody) -kz