On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Perhaps we should look at toolchain-source? I don't like it as a
> solution, but it already exists.
True. Let's allow gcc 3.1 to progress to the point where we can talk
about this more seriously. For now, I don't think there's any great
demand to
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> Concerning the port of GNAT, I've done the Sparc and PowerPC one and that
> was quite straightforward. I understand that Alpha may be much harder
> because it will be the first Linux/64 bits port.
Preciselythat, and the docs to do such a thing are
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:20:42PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> Ok, fine with me. This means however that GCC source package will be
> duplicated (starting from 3.1, as it has been said).
Perhaps we should look at toolchain-source? I don't like it as a
solution, but it already exists.
> Once G
On 2/10, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
| > I'm also very reluctant to package Ada at the same time as the main GCC
| > snapshots because it requires Ada installed to build. Others might
| > argue with me on that point, though.
|
| I agree with the above. If GNAT isn't already compiled on an
|
Hello!
This is merely an automated notification mail from the ddts 'Debian Description
Translation Server'.
A translator recently uploaded a new version of the description of this
package. The descriptions are included below.
For more information about this mail and the ddts, please visit this p
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:45:58PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > I'm also very reluctant to package Ada at the same time as the main GCC
> > snapshots because it requires Ada installed to build. Others might
> > argue with me on that point, though.
>
> you can tu
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
> you can turn off any language in the debian/rules files you want. or
> do you argue that a bootstrap would fail, if no ada compiler already
> exists for the platform?
If my understanding of how they're accomplishing the merge is correct, it
can be disa
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I'm also very reluctant to package Ada at the same time as the main GCC
> snapshots because it requires Ada installed to build. Others might
> argue with me on that point, though.
I agree with the above. If GNAT isn't already compiled on an
archit
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> I'm also very reluctant to package Ada at the same time as the main GCC
> snapshots because it requires Ada installed to build. Others might
> argue with me on that point, though.
you can turn off any language in the debian/rules files you want. or
do you argue that
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:14:48AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> So it's:
>
> #if defined(__linux__) && defined(__GLIBC__) && !defined(__FAVOR_BSD)
>
> /* defines go in here */
>
> #endif
>
> Is that right? What happens on a non-Linux system running glibc? (Or
> is this not
Samuel Tardieu writes:
> Dear GCC maintainer,
>
> GNAT (the Ada compiler) sources are currently being checked in in the
> GCC 3.0 tree. It would probably make sense for the GCC team to take over
> the packaging of GNAT on Debian. I can help if needed.
>
> Sam, actual GNAT Debian maintain
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:05:16PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> Dear GCC maintainer,
>
> GNAT (the Ada compiler) sources are currently being checked in in the
> GCC 3.0 tree. It would probably make sense for the GCC team to take over
> the packaging of GNAT on Debian. I can help if needed.
No,
Dear GCC maintainer,
GNAT (the Ada compiler) sources are currently being checked in in the
GCC 3.0 tree. It would probably make sense for the GCC team to take over
the packaging of GNAT on Debian. I can help if needed.
Sam, actual GNAT Debian maintainer
pgp4ljtg5YPHs.pgp
Description: PGP sign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 114210 g77-2.96
Bug#114210: g77: Segfault while compiling r-base on ia64
Bug reassigned from package `g77' to `g77-2.96'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs
If memory serves me right, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 06:40:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I believe Linux is the OS that pchar woks on that uses different names for
> > the members of struct udphdr. Until now, _BSD_SOURCE has provided a way to
> > have things "just
Package: gcc
Version: 2:2.95.4-6
Severity: normal
When one invokes the compiler driver on a language (e.g. Ada) for which
there is no front end installed, it exits successfully, which causes Make
to think that the compilation succeeded. Observe:
$ touch ada.ads
$ gcc -c -v ada.ads ; echo $?
Read
Package: g77
Version: 2:2.96-8
Severity: important
While trying to build r-base on ia64, encountered the following:
make[5]: Entering directory
`/scratch/home/jdaily/packages/r-base/r-base-1.3.1/src/modules/lapack'
gcc -I. -I../../../src/include -I../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include
-DHAV
Hello!
This is merely an automated notification mail from the ddts 'Debian Description
Translation Server'.
A translator recently uploaded a new version of the description of this
package. The descriptions are included below.
For more information about this mail and the ddts, please visit this p
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2001 22:46:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in new gcc-3.0 build
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
19 matches
Mail list logo
