희망찬 새해, 신년 운세 보세요!!!
☎060-700-8865 대구 유명 역술인이 직접 상담 해 드립니다.(대구MBC역학강사, 동아백화점
문화센터 역학강사, 영남일보 주간 운세...) 직업운, 시험운, 진학운, 애정운, 사랑운, 건강운, 토정비결,
속궁합 겉궁합, 사업운, 승진운, 작명, 택일, 별자리점, 풍수지리, 신통하게 맞추는 과거와 미래, "깜짝 놀라실겁니다"
"역술은 통계에 의한 과학적인 학문입니다"
☎060-700-8865
I believed I tested a case that I had not. I was using -Wl to set the
linker switches. This won't work any more. Using the switches
directly with gcc-3.0 works properly.
gcc-3.0 -static
versus
gcc-3.0 -Wl,-static
Thanks.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 07:28:55PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> -static -lstdc++ -lm -lgcc_s -lgcc -lc -lgcc_s -lgcc
Something is screwy with your setup then. The command works for me with
no problem. Which version of the g++-3.0 package do you have installed?
Any environment variables?
--
.--===-=-==-=---=---
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 05:32:49PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > The error seems to be in the specs file. In mine, I have:
> > >
> > > *libgcc:
> > > %{shared-libgcc:-lgcc_s%M
> > > -lgcc}%{static-libgcc:-lgcc}%{!shared-libgcc:%{!static-libgcc:%{shared:-lgcc_s%M
> > > -lgcc}}}%{!shared-libgcc:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:17:15PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 04:53:20PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > This fails
> > >
> > > g++-3.0 -o bin/program o/object1.o ... -static
> > >
> > > because gcc-3.0 cannot find the libgcc_s.a file.
> > >
> > > /usr/bin/ld:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 04:53:20PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > This fails
> >
> > g++-3.0 -o bin/program o/object1.o ... -static
> >
> > because gcc-3.0 cannot find the libgcc_s.a file.
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
>
> It shouldn't be looking for libgcc_s.a, it should use libg
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:44:46PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It appears that the command line I use in gcc-2.9x for building s
> static version of a program fails with gcc-3.0. It also appears, from
> the documentation, that there is a switch to make it work anyway.
>
> This works with th
It appears that the command line I use in gcc-2.9x for building s
static version of a program fails with gcc-3.0. It also appears, from
the documentation, that there is a switch to make it work anyway.
This works with the 2.9x version.
g++ -o bin/program o/object1.o ... -static
This fails
> So, concluding, the following isn't correct?
>
> ,
> | #
> | #If SWISH++ doesn't work correctly with optimization on, but it
> | #works just fine with it off, then there is a bug in your
> | #compiler's optimizer.
> `
No. Something like
# If SWISH++ doesn't work
> "Martin" == Martin v Loewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thanks for the fast reply, Martin
[...]
>> Is the trial and error method the usual approach ? ;-)
Martin> No. Instead, one needs to clearly identify the problem. If
Martin> it is a compiler bug, it would fall into the c
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:38:12AM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:55:45AM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > > - Change crossbase in /etc/dpkg/cross-compile from /usr/local to /usr.
> > > Why
> > > is this defaulting to /usr/local? Don't we want cross-compil
> /usr/include/g++-v3/backward/iostream.h:35: using directive `ostream'
> introduced ambiguous type `ostream''
> I know it's probably due to libraries versions mismatch, but I got libstdc++
> exactly the same version as gcc.
I'm now pretty sure tha it is *not* due to library version mismatch,
but
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:55:45AM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> > - Change crossbase in /etc/dpkg/cross-compile from /usr/local to /usr. Why
> > is this defaulting to /usr/local? Don't we want cross-compilers in /usr?
>
> Well I suppose it depends how you chop your disc up, pers
13 matches
Mail list logo
