Re: experimental gcc-3.2 packages

2002-08-08 Thread Martin v. Loewis
Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have posted the test script and preprocessed source here: > http://apt-proxy.sourceforge.net/ooo/g++test > http://apt-proxy.sourceforge.net/ooo/test.cxx.bz2 Maybe I'm missing something, but... Is it the case that ucb::ContentProviderImplHelper::~Con

gcc does not output weak symbol unless declared

2002-08-08 Thread poulot
>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Benoit Poulot-Cazajous >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: #pragma weak problem >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Category: c >Class: wrong-code >Release: 3.1.1 (Debian testing/unstable) >Environment: System: Linux w

Bug#155900: nonstandard overloads in num_get facet

2002-08-08 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Package: libstdc++3 Version: 3.0.4-7 Using woody/i386 The num_get facets should (according to the book 'IOstreams and locales' by Langer and Kreft) contain put methods for bool long unsigned long double long double void* GCC's stdlib instead has bool #ifdef _GLIBCPP_RESOLVE_LIB_D

Re: experimental gcc-3.2 packages

2002-08-08 Thread Chris Halls
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 08:07:03PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > http://ftp-master-debian.org/~doko/gcc I've tracked down the problem I've been having compiling OpenOffice.org on i386 and g++-3.2 to a difference between output of different compiler versions. The build process complains tha