On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 04:07:36PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 02:17:45PM +0200, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> > This
> > is very annoying as you need to fill in all the gory details if you want
> > to have a string of something else (like string to hold a list
>
> Well, yeah. "
On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 09:38, Matthias Klose wrote:
> patching file gcc/config/arm/linux-elf.h
> configure.in:2120: /usr/bin/m4: ERROR: Recursion limit of 1024 exceeded, use
> -L to change it
> make: *** [stamps/02-patch-stamp-arm-tune] Error 1
Yeah, I suspected it was to do with that. I still do
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 02:17:45PM +0200, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> bits/char_traits.h Defines the char_traits template without providing a
> default implementation, only specialisations for char and wchar_t.
This is by design.
> This
> is very annoying as you need to fill in all the gory details if
Package: g++-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Hi!
bits/char_traits.h Defines the char_traits template without providing a
default implementation, only specialisations for char and wchar_t. This
is very annoying as you need to fill in all the gory details if you want
to h
Philip Blundell writes:
> Hmm, where did this change come from?
>
> * debian/patches/arm-tune.dpatch: Increase stack limit for configure.
>
> It seems to be breaking the build: I can't find any version of autoconf
> that actually understands the -L option. Matthias, any idea?
See
http://build
5 matches
Mail list logo