Bug#158988: g++-3.2: char_traits template does not have a implementation

2002-08-31 Thread Phil Edwards
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 04:07:36PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 02:17:45PM +0200, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > This > > is very annoying as you need to fill in all the gory details if you want > > to have a string of something else (like string to hold a list > > Well, yeah. "

Re: arm-tune.dpatch

2002-08-31 Thread Philip Blundell
On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 09:38, Matthias Klose wrote: > patching file gcc/config/arm/linux-elf.h > configure.in:2120: /usr/bin/m4: ERROR: Recursion limit of 1024 exceeded, use > -L to change it > make: *** [stamps/02-patch-stamp-arm-tune] Error 1 Yeah, I suspected it was to do with that. I still do

Bug#158988: g++-3.2: char_traits template does not have a implementation

2002-08-31 Thread Phil Edwards
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 02:17:45PM +0200, Tobias Hunger wrote: > bits/char_traits.h Defines the char_traits template without providing a > default implementation, only specialisations for char and wchar_t. This is by design. > This > is very annoying as you need to fill in all the gory details if

Bug#158988: g++-3.2: char_traits template does not have a implementation

2002-08-31 Thread Tobias Hunger
Package: g++-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Hi! bits/char_traits.h Defines the char_traits template without providing a default implementation, only specialisations for char and wchar_t. This is very annoying as you need to fill in all the gory details if you want to h

Re: arm-tune.dpatch

2002-08-31 Thread Matthias Klose
Philip Blundell writes: > Hmm, where did this change come from? > > * debian/patches/arm-tune.dpatch: Increase stack limit for configure. > > It seems to be breaking the build: I can't find any version of autoconf > that actually understands the -L option. Matthias, any idea? See http://build