Hi,
GNAT 3.15p has been released last November and it is still
not packaged in Debian. Since, the GNAT from GCC tree is
still not stable enough, I'd suggest that we keep on updating
the ACT public release.
Jon Ward told he was packaging it but nothing seemed to
happen.
Is anyone st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:-
> In the example below, '&a' is the address of a local copy of 'a' not of
> 'a'.
> if the type of 'a' is changed to int, it works as expected.
Works as who expected? Where is the bug? Please quote which part of
the C standard is violated. You got an addre
Package: gnat-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre1
3.2.3 20030210 (prerelease) (i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Compiler gives a wrong error message:
pts/7:x,1$ gcc-3.2 -c -gnatN p.ads
p.ads:5:08: instantiation error at s-exctab.adb:169
p.ads:5:08: non-static call not allowed in preelaborated unit
package P is
p
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Stephen Kennedy
>Organization: Telekinesys Research
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: Address of 'char' is incorrect.
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: c
>Class: wrong-code
>Release: 3.2.3 20030210 (Debian prerelease)
Victor Porton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Error detected at
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.2.3/adainclude/i-cpoint.adb:4
> 1:1 [/usr/include/gtkada/gdk-even
This is a well-known GNAT bug, GCC PR 5679.
Package: gnat-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre1
3.2.3 20030210 (prerelease) (i386-pc-linux-gnu)
libgtkada1-dev version 1.2.12-7 (note that installed libgtkada1-dev version is
inconsistent with the version of Gnat, no other package version
inconsistencies on my Debian), backstore_area.ad[bs] attached.
Today (2 reboots down the road), the very same cmdline in the
very same place (although untarred again into a different directory)
goes flawlessly. I am sorry to not have applied the sig11 FAQ
techniques on the spot during the original submission.
(I'm talking about http://www.tldp.org/FAQ/sig11/h
7 matches
Mail list logo
