On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> please always include information about the status of the gcc-snapshot
> package as well.
This is what the snapshot produces
.file "b.c"
.text
.p2align 2,,3
.globl k
.type k, @function
k:
As per follow-up email, the bug still haunts us ...
/usr/bin/g77-3.2 -c -fPIC -O0 -g0 zbknu.f -o pic/zbknu.o
zbknu.f: In subroutine `zbknu':
zbknu.f:567: Internal compiler error in instantiate_virtual_regs_1, at
function.c:3980
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropr
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 07:26:08PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > last succeeded bootstrap is the gcc-3.2.2 release. The 20030210
> > checkout fails with:
> >
> > /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile
> > /build/buildd/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds0/build/gcc/xgcc
> > -B/build/buildd/gcc-
Your message dated Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:08:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#180102: gcc-3.2: [hppa] FTBFS arts 1.1.0 assembler errors
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 07:26:08PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> last succeeded bootstrap is the gcc-3.2.2 release. The 20030210
> checkout fails with:
>
> /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile
> /build/buildd/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds0/build/gcc/xgcc
> -B/build/buildd/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds0/build/gcc/ -B/usr/alpha
last succeeded bootstrap is the gcc-3.2.2 release. The 20030210
checkout fails with:
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /build/buildd/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds0/build/gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds0/build/gcc/ -B/usr/alpha-linux/bin/
-B/usr/alpha-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/alpha-linux/include -DHAVE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 180937 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#180937: g++ internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 180937 [PR c++/9789] [3.2 ICE regression, fixed in 3.3] Erro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 180750 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#180750: [fixed in snapshot (20030129)] arm regression, ICE with -O2
(change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1945)
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 180750 [PR target/9790] [
Peter Hawkins writes:
> Package: gcj-3.2
> Version: 3.2.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi...
>
> This is like #143912 in a way. Since gcj is providing a java compiler
> that can do JNI, it should provide a wrapper script for the javah
> command used to produce JNI stubs. I have quickly hacked up su
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `c++/9789'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: c++
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: [3.2 ICE regression, fixed in 3.3] Error reporting routines
>re-entered
>Ar
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `target/9790'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: target
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: [3.2 regression on arm] ICE with -O2 (change_address_1, at
>emit-rtl.
We need more information:
- please send the preprocessed (maybe compressed) file init.i
- show the compilation options used
- please try to compile with the gcc from the gcc-snapshot package
Thanks, Matthias
Ricardo Galli writes:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.2-1
> Severity: important
>
>
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Category: target
>Class: ice-on-legal-code
>Release: 3.2.2 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>Envi
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:"H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Category: c++
>Class: ice-on-illegal-code
>Release: 3.2.2 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>
> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > Did we already report this one upstream?
>
> see #175478, submitted by someone called Edd ... ;-)
Ah, yes, amnesia hitting me squarely on the forehead. Thanks for the
cluebat,
> > Note the -O0 -g0, not sure what
> > else I can try, other tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 181679 [fixed in gcc-3.3] Preelaborate, exceptions, and -gnatN
Bug#181679: gnat-3.2: Preelaborate, exceptions, and -gnatN
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
retitle 181679 [fixed in gcc-3.3] Preelaborate, exceptions, and -gnatN
thanks
$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -c -gnatN bug_181679.ads
No code generated for file bug_181679.ads (package spec)
Victor Porton writes:
> Package: gnat-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre1
>
> 3.2.3 20030210 (prerelease) (i3
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
>
> Folks,
>
> Did we already report this one upstream?
see #175478, submitted by someone called Edd ... ;-)
> Note the -O0 -g0, not sure what
> else I can try, other than to shoot all the four remaining linux-on-m68k
> users left on the planet. Just kidding.
you fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> Back from vacation ? :-)
too soon :-) last week planes could'nt start due to a cyclone, but
that didn't delay my return this week ;-)
> > > Is anyone still working on this or should I give it a try
> > > (I'm not th
forwarded 181660 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 181660 [PR ada/5679] ICE compiling libgtkada1
merge 181660 147864
thanks
Florian Weimer writes:
> Victor Porton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > | Error detected at
> > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.2.3/adainclude/i-cpoint.adb:4
> > 1:1 [/usr/include/g
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 181660 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#181660: gnat-3.2: internal compiler error
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 181660 [PR ada/5679] ICE compiling libgtkada1
Bug#181660: gnat-3.2: internal compiler error
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Back from vacation ? :-)
> > Is anyone still working on this or should I give it a try
> > (I'm not the best skilled though)?
>
> Usually Florian keeps an open eye on gnat. AFAICR 3.14 passes an Ada
> validation suite, which 3.15 does not yet pass
=?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me?= Marant writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> GNAT 3.15p has been released last November and it is still
> not packaged in Debian. Since, the GNAT from GCC tree is
> still not stable enough, I'd suggest that we keep on updating
> the ACT public release.
>
> Jon Ward told he w
23 matches
Mail list logo
