Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 192296 normal
Bug#192296: octave-forge_2003.04.28-3(hppa/unstable):
Severity set to `normal'.
> reassign 193804 g++-3.2
Bug#193804: octave: Octave segfaults at start
Bug reassigned from package `octave' to `g++-3.2'.
> merge 192296 193804
Bug
[ Dropped non-Debian lists. ]
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the other hand, dwarf exceptions are clearly superior to sjlj.
> We've never _released_ a distro compiled with 3.2 so we can break
> the binary ABI without major repurcussions.
Err, no you can't. Redoing the C++ trans
> On Mer, 2003-05-21 at 01:08, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > I'm not sure it's my call to make; I can see arguments on both sides.
>
> Thats at least one of the reasons. Reputation capital is a wonderous
> thing. Accept reality, you are the Linus of parisc Linux like it or not
> 8)
I agree.
Dave
--
Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> Any news?
>
> Thanks, Matthias
The rebuild failed as well. I just forgot to follow up to the bug.
... Adam
On Mer, 2003-05-21 at 01:08, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I'm not sure it's my call to make; I can see arguments on both sides.
Thats at least one of the reasons. Reputation capital is a wonderous
thing. Accept reality, you are the Linus of parisc Linux like it or not
8)
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 01:42:53AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> For Debian GNU/Linux gcc-3.3 is currently configured with
>
> --with-sjlj-exceptions
>
> to allow a binary compatible upgrade from gcc-3.2 to gcc-3.3. The
> other Debian platform, where sjlj based exceptions changed to dwarf2
For Debian GNU/Linux gcc-3.3 is currently configured with
--with-sjlj-exceptions
to allow a binary compatible upgrade from gcc-3.2 to gcc-3.3. The
other Debian platform, where sjlj based exceptions changed to dwarf2
based exceptions is m68k, therefore the CC.
As there are no hppa/m68k di
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 11:05:17PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - add /lib to /etc/ld.so.conf before /usr/lib
> - install the new libgcc1
> - then upgrade other packages.
>
> It seems to be a local problem with your installation, else we had
> more than one bug report ... I'm downgrading the rep
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 178561 + upstream
Bug#178561: gcc-3.2-doc: stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 178561 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#178561: gcc-3.2-doc: stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:"Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: serious
>Priority: low
>Category: c
>Class: change-request
>Release: 3.3 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable)
>Enviro
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `c++/10891'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: c++
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: code using dynamic_cast causes segfaults when -fno-rtti is used
>Arrival-Da
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: c++
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: 3.3 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable)
>Environment
Your message dated Tue, 20 May 2003 23:21:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line JNI/C++ Exceptions using glib2.1 and Sun JVM
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
reassign 179018 xemacs21
tags 179018 + moreinfo
thanks
Looking at the time, the report was submitted, it looks like the build
was made using gcc-2.95. Please retry with gcc-3.2 and/or gcc-3.3,
then eventually reassign the report to gcc.
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: c++
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: 3.3 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable)
>Environment:
Sy
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/spec4.C Execution test
XPASS:
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: ada
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: 3.3 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable)
>Environment:
Syste
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7731
# of unexpect
Package: libstdc++5-3.3-dev
Version: 1:3.3-2
Severity: minor
As the subject says, g++-3.3 no longer supports the
header for backwards compatibility, while g++-3.2 did. At least one
source package, dx, needs this header.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `c++/10888'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: c++
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 warning regression] inlining failure for allocate in
>~vector()
>
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `ada/10889'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: ada
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: Convention Fortran matrices mishandled in generics
>Arrival-Date: Tue May
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `c++/10887'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: c++
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] specialization of private members structs
>fails
>Arr
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Herbert Valerio Riedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Category: c++
>Class: rejects-legal
>Release: 3.3 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable)
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 193838 important
Bug#193838: libgcc1: installation of libgcc1:3.3-2 causes failure of massive
number of programs
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 193838 + unreproducible
Bug#193838: libgcc1: installation of libgcc1:3.3-2 causes failure of
[Send only an BCC to python-dev, as this is a Debian issue only]
Gregor Hoffleit writes:
> * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030519 18:39]:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:16:50AM -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> > >
> > > Luke> gcc 3.3 is now the latest for unstable.
> > >
>
Weird. I just upgraded to latest libgcc1. Everything seems to
work alright.
NOTE: I am not a GCC maintainer :)
*** Std libs libgcc1 3.3-2 3.3-2 GCC support library
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3 (Debian)
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free softwar
Your message dated 20 May 2003 20:43:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#193713: was can't compile kernel exit whit error.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
I tested on another machine after doing an upgrade to gcc-3.3, and could
reproduce it there as well:
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer
-pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=ath
I can reproduce this bug. It fails at line 440 of ide-cd.h
Compiling with gcc-3.2 works fine.
--
Brian Knotts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 11:59:25AM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030519 18:39]:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:16:50AM -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> > >
> > > Luke> gcc 3.3 is now the latest for unstable.
> > >
> > > Luke> gcc 3.3 con
Hello,
What is the proper way to get libstdc++.so.5 in Debian installation ?
I try to use SGI Open GL Performer libraries.
Regards,
Stan Jesmanowicz
Your message dated Tue, 20 May 2003 08:24:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#193956: gcc-3.3: missing cc and gcc symlinks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 193409 gcc-defaults
Bug#193409: gcc-doc: missing virtual gcc-doc and cpp-doc packages
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-doc' to `gcc-defaults'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-0pre9
Severity: normal
When I installed gcc-3.3 via
apt-get install gcc-3.3
on mips testing on 5/19, it didn't generate the /usr/bin/{gcc,cc} symlinks
to /usr/bin/gcc-3.3. Maybe this is expected (since when I typed 'apt-get
install gcc' it tried to install gcc-3.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 42946 + upstream
Bug#42946: [fixed in 3.4] Parse errors for "simple" code
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tags 55298 + upstream
Bug#55298: [PR c/3481, partly fixed in 3.2] function attributes should apply to
function pointers too
T
Package: libgcj2
Version: 3.0.4-12
The shared library, /usr/lib/libgcj.so.2, has undefined
non-weak symbols as shown with below...
ldd -r /usr/lib/libgcj.so.2
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x0fbc)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0fdd)
libgcc_s.so.1 =>
36 matches
Mail list logo
