Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 194330 g++-3.2
Bug#194330: g++: [mips/mipsel] ice: in propagate_one_insn
Bug reassigned from package `kdebase' to `g++-3.2'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNC
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9074
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNC
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8608
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNC
* Brian M. Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:35:23PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Brian M. Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > Indeed they are. The Linux kernel is part of the release criteria (at
> > > least it was for 3.0) [0]. The site stat
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNC
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: calls run
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: cxxtest run
FAIL: field run
FAIL: final_method run
FAIL: findclass run
FAIL: invoke run
FAIL: martin run
FAIL: noclass run
FAIL
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:35:23PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Brian M. Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > Indeed they are. The Linux kernel is part of the release criteria (at
> > least it was for 3.0) [0]. The site states:
>
> Which kernel version? On which architecture? Wi
* Brian M. Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Indeed they are. The Linux kernel is part of the release criteria (at
> least it was for 3.0) [0]. The site states:
Which kernel version? On which architecture? With which drivers?
Its fair to say Gcc shouldn't have any bugs that show up in a few
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:11:43PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:51:03AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> > reopen 194242
> > reassign 194242 gcc
> > retitle 194242 gcc: defaulting to 3.3 prevents compilation of the kernel
> > merge 194242 194196
> > thanks, control
> >
> >
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6905
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNC
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10587
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UN
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10692
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UN
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 194330 kdebase
Bug#194330: g++: [mips/mipsel] ice: in propagate_one_insn
Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.2' to `kdebase'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 10:44:51AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > fastjar/fastjar.texi
> > fastjar/fastjar.info
> > fastjar/grepjar.1
> > fastjar/jar.1
>
> Interesting. As I did write these, I do have the right to relicense
> and distribute them?
Your original version defintily yes.
Nathanael Nerode writes:
> The GCC source tarball contains, well, a lot of things.
As a first step, I would like to see a build of GFDL free packages
from the upstream source, so you can easily change back.
> The following are
> FDLed with invariant sections or cover texts and so non-free:
>
>
Accepted:
cpp-3.3_3.3-2_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3-2_arm.deb
fastjar_3.3-2_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3-2_arm.deb
fixincludes_3.3-2_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3-2_arm.deb
g++-3.3_3.3-2_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/g++-3.3_3.3-2_arm.deb
g77-
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10587
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-25 06:51 ---
Hello,
I can reproduce the error in this report on gcc 3.1, 3.2.3, 3.3 branch and
mainline (20030514)
18 matches
Mail list logo