Howdy,
I like the idea of this in principle. In practice though, I think
I'd rather see it start out as more of a best practices guide, drawing
from the lessons learned in the existing packages (and not only Debian
ones), than an attempt at making policy right off the bat.
Before enshining any
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 04:24:54PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> >This would have (or at least should
> >have) been caught, because gcc 3.3 introduced a complete incompatibility
> >with older versions: creating an error when pasting together two such
> >tokens. I don'
Brian M. Carlson wrote:
This would have (or at least should
have) been caught, because gcc 3.3 introduced a complete incompatibility
with older versions: creating an error when pasting together two such
tokens. I don't know what the standard says on this issue, but at most
it requires a diagnostic,
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9071
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-26 21:49 ---
Hello,
can you provide a small testcase for this problem? And if possible verify that
this is still the
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9071
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 194345 gcc-3.3
Bug#194345: g++ 3.3 needs to much memory / gets killed by OOM-killer
Bug#194513: Internal error: unbalanced parenthesis in operand 1
Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.3' to `gcc-3.3'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:22:06PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Brian M. Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:35:23PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Brian M. Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Indeed they are. The Linux kernel
Thanks for working on the reports. Please notice, that the original
submitter address of the bug reports was not converted from gnats to
bugzilla, so it may take a bit longer to contact the submitters.
Thanks, Matthias
Matthias Klose wrote:
fastjar/fastjar.texi
fastjar/fastjar.info
fastjar/grepjar.1
fastjar/jar.1
Interesting. As I did write these, I do have the right to relicense
and distribute them?
Check the agreement you signed with the FSF; you probably do. But you
should check for modifications made by oth
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10206
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-26 19:11 ---
Subject: Re: Bug#186185: [Bug target/10206] [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression][arm] ICE
in emit-rtl.c:change_addr
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10206
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UN
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10257
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UN
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10206
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-26 18:46 ---
Hello,
with gcc 3.1 and 3.2.3 cross compilers for arm-elf, I get an "illegal
instruction" on this test
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8603
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNC
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Dennis Haney
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: inliner is broken
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Category: optimization
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: 3.3 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable)
>Environment:
System
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 3.3-2
gcc-3.3 fails to build sane-backends 1.0.12-1 on m68k with the
following internal error :
gcc -c -g -O2 -W -Wall -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include
-DPATH_SANE_CONFIG_DIR=/etc/sane.d -DPATH_SANE_DATA_DIR=/usr/share -DV_MAJOR=1
-DV_MINOR=0 -DBACKEND
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 194330 + moreinfo
Bug#194330: g++: [mips/mipsel] ice: in propagate_one_insn
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8603
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-26 06:34 ---
Subject: [Bug target/8603] [Alpha] s?addl pattern doesn't work
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-26 05:13 ---
> with gcc 3.2.3, I get the reported behavior. With gcc 3.3 branch and
> mainline (20030524) I the following result. Is this correct? Thanks,
>
> test.o: file format elf64-alpha
>
> Disassembly of section .text:
>
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 00:15:31 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.3-doc
>As an extension, GNU CPP permits string literals to cross multiple
> lines without escaping the embedded newlines.
> This no longer seems to be the case, however:
Indeed, this piece of documentation is out
tags 194330 + moreinfo
thanks
Chris Cheney writes:
> This bug is obviously not in _KDEBASE_ if you wish to ignore it fine,
> but do not reassign it where it does not belong.
Matthias Klose writes:
> reassign 194330 kdebase
> thanks
>
> please
> - submit a complete report including the preproces
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8603
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-26 05:13 ---
Hello,
with gcc 3.2.3, I get the reported behavior. With gcc 3.3 branch and mainline
(20030524) I the
23 matches
Mail list logo
