PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 09:15:04PM -0500, Ryan Hayle wrote:
> Package: g++-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.1-0rc1
> Severity: minor
>
> I just installed g++-3.3 on a fresh Debian system, and no symlink is
> created from /usr/bin/g++-3.3 to /usr/bin/g++. Perhaps this is by
> design, but it's annoying (and
> [CC to jda]
>
> Please can you recheck with a current gcc snapshot (from the
> gcc-snapshot package) and attach the preprocessed source?
This doesn't appear to be a gcc problem. The register %r3 is saved
on the stack in __stdio_init_file_nothreads. The stack location
is clobbered by the fstat
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.1-0rc1
Severity: minor
I just installed g++-3.3 on a fresh Debian system, and no symlink is
created from /usr/bin/g++-3.3 to /usr/bin/g++. Perhaps this is by
design, but it's annoying (and potentially confusing) to have to make
the link yourself. Are the variou
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.1-0rc1
Severity: normal
trying to compile kernel 2.4.22-pre8 on alpha i get:
fork.c: In function `dup_mmap':
fork.c:144: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 59 52 61 0 0x2ce7760 (set (reg/f:DI 82)
(symbol_ref:DI ("@Smmlist_nr"))) -1 (nil)
(expr_list:R
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jul 22 22:33:04 UTC 2003
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/forced1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/packed2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty1.C scan-assembler top level
FAIL: g++.
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jul 22 22:33:04 UTC 2003
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/packed2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty1.C scan-assembler top level
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C (test for excess
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jul 22 06:27:21 UTC 2003
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/forced1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.eh/terminate2.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jul 22 06:27:21 UTC 2003
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/other/packed1.C execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jul 22 06:27:21 UTC 2003
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jul 22 06:27:21 UTC 2003
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes29
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jul 22 06:27:21 UTC 2003
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/other/packed1.C execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
Clint Adams writes:
> Package: gcc
> Version: multiple
> Severity: normal
>
> The bogofilter test suite fails on m68k, hppa, mips, mipsel, and arm
> due to a segfault in bogoutil.
>
> On hppa, at least, compiling with -O0 or -O1 results in a working binary.
> Therefore I assume an optimization bu
Package: gcc
Version: multiple
Severity: normal
The bogofilter test suite fails on m68k, hppa, mips, mipsel, and arm
due to a segfault in bogoutil.
On hppa, at least, compiling with -O0 or -O1 results in a working binary.
Therefore I assume an optimization bug. (This was tested with
gcc-3.3 3.3.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 202696 g++-3.3
Bug#202696: [Bug c++/11645] [3.3/3.4 Regression] Failure to deal with using and
private inheritance
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-3.3'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
[CC to jda]
Please can you recheck with a current gcc snapshot (from the
gcc-snapshot package) and attach the preprocessed source?
Gerrit Pape writes:
> Package: gcc
>
> This applies to gcc_3.2.3-6 and gcc_3.3.1-0pre0 on hppa; gcc_3.0.4-16
> doesn't have this problem.
>
> The dietlibc_0.22-2 b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 23 + sarge-ignore
Bug#23: cpp: contains non-free manpages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
--- Additional Comments From pme at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-24 19:01
---
> Can someone give me an idea of what the proper followup to this message
> might be? Is more
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
--- Additional Comments From branden at debian dot org 2003-07-24 18:49
---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation
and/or validatio
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
gccbug at chiefrocker dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 193787 sarge-ignore
Bug#193787:
gcc-3.2-doc,gcc-3.3-doc,cpp-3.2-doc,cpp-3.3-doc,g77-3.2-doc,g77-3.3-doc: GCC
documentation is non-free
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Package: g++
Version: 3:3.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
There is an upstream fix for gcc 3.3.1 so that OpenOffice.org can
actually compile. This has been committed to the gcc cvs. Could a new
version be released with this feature.
Thanks
KenF
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11654
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11654
--- Additional Comments From geoffk at geoffk dot org 2003-07-24 06:46
---
Subject: Re: New: gcc seg fault when using pre-compiled headers and -gstabs
This is known. I
24 matches
Mail list logo
